I think instead of abandoning the support of JDK11, it would be better to abandon the java8 and support java 17.
发件人: Jia Fan <[email protected]> 日期: 星期二, 2025年11月4日 21:33 收件人: [email protected] <[email protected]> 主题: Re: Discussion on Cancel JDK 11 for Seattunnel CI -1. I'm confused as to why we're reducing CI time by abandoning support for some users. We have an existing solution: migrating end-to-end test cases to unit tests, which is also underway. Isn't removing CI from JDK 11 a lazy approach? I've never heard of abandoning support for newer versions in favor of supporting older ones. > Also, there aren't many users using JDK 11 How did you arrive at the conclusion that there are more JDK 8 users than JDK 11 users? zhangshenghang <[email protected]> 于2025年11月4日周二 21:14写道： > > Hi Seatunnel community: > > Currently, Seatunnel's CI includes checks for both JDK 8 and JDK 11, > which is quite time-consuming. Also, there aren't many users using JDK 11. > What do you all think about disabling JDK 11 CI? Furthermore, I'm unsure > how many exceptions occur in JDK 11 but not in JDK 8. > > Welcome to the discussion > > Regards, > Jast (Shenghang) Cisco Confidential
