I trust the judgement of the maintainers  :)
It looks like the vote passes.

It's a bit concerning that correctness issues aren't treated as blockers.
Correctness issues are really the worst kind of defect as it could silently
corrupt your data. Performance issues and breaking API changes will break
your pipelines in a very noticeable way without corrupting the data. A lax
attitude towards correctness is a red flag for many enterprises. You won't
trust your data with software that might corrupt it.

If the release process doesn't allow for fixing defects it needs to be
fixed. A defect should only be judged by its severity. Not how hard it is
to cut a new release candidate. Commonly a release branch is created when
the process is started. Features and bug fixes are merged to main as usual.
If there are any blockers fixed on main they are cherry picked from main to
the release branch.

Looking forward to Sedona 1.3.0! Great work every one!

//Martin

Den mån 14 nov. 2022 kl 22:51 skrev Jia Yu <[email protected]>:

> Hi Martin,
>
> I don't think this is a blocker and we can put it in the next release. It
> is kind of complicated to create another release candidate unless there is
> a critical bug or it misses required components for an Apache release.
>
> Hope this makes sense :-)
>
> Jia
>
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 3:13 AM Martin Andersson <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Should SEDONA-193 be considered a blocker for the release?
> >
> > It's a correctness issue and a regression from sedona-1.2.1.
> >
> > /Martin
> >
> > Den mån 14 nov. 2022 kl 03:18 skrev Kengo Seki <[email protected]>:
> >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > I checked:
> > > * Download links are valid
> > > * Checksums and PGP signatures are valid
> > > * DISCLAIMER and NOTICE are included
> > > * Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release
> > > * The project can compile from the source code
> > >
> > > Kengo Seki <[email protected]>
> > >
> > > 2022年11月13日(日) 21:20 若井幸夫 <[email protected]>:
> > > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > I checked:
> > > > * Download links are valid
> > > > * Checksums and PGP signatures are valid
> > > > * DISCLAIMER and NOTICE are included
> > > > * Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current
> release
> > > > * The project can compile from the source code
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Nov 13, 2022 at 11:07 AM Jia Yu <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Felix,
> > > > >
> > > > > In terms of licenses, the only problematic dependency in Sedona is
> > the
> > > DBI
> > > > > in Sedona R module. However, Yitao has removed this dependency from
> > > Sedona
> > > > > in this release:
> > > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/commit/54942047b91a4f60f6d6e3128b73f4c9a7342982
> > > > >
> > > > > I think we are all good here.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Jia
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sat, Nov 12, 2022 at 3:17 PM Felix Cheung <
> > > [email protected]>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > What’s the thought on R dbplyr dependency?
> > > > > > ________________________________
> > > > > > From: Jia Yu <[email protected]>
> > > > > > Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2022 12:40:27 PM
> > > > > > To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sedona 1.3.0-incubating-rc1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Dear all,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This release is supposed to be the last release before
> graduation.
> > > Please
> > > > > > make sure you vote +1 with a checklist (see my vote below). The
> > > incubator
> > > > > > PMCs rejected our graduation proposal last time because we didn't
> > > provide
> > > > > > the checklist for each vote.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Again, checking this release is extremely easy if you use the
> > > MyBinder
> > > > > > notebook provided in Mo's email. All you need to do is click a
> few
> > > buttons
> > > > > > and wait a few minutes.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > We really appreciate your help!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Jia
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I checked:
> > > > > > * Download links are valid
> > > > > > * Checksums and PGP signatures are valid
> > > > > > * DISCLAIMER and NOTICE are included
> > > > > > * Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current
> > > release
> > > > > > * The project can compile from the source code
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sat, Nov 12, 2022 at 8:48 AM Mo Sarwat <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This is a call for vote on Apache Sedona 1.3.0-incubating-rc1.
> > > Please
> > > > > > refer
> > > > > > > to the changes listed at the bottom of this email.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Release notes:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/blob/sedona-1.3.0-incubating-rc1/docs/setup/release-notes.md
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Build instructions:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/blob/sedona-1.3.0-incubating-rc1/docs/setup/compile.md
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > GitHub tag:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/releases/tag/sedona-1.3.0-incubating-rc1
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > GPG public key to verify the Release:
> > > > > > > https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/sedona/KEYS
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Source code and binaries:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/sedona/1.3.0-incubating-rc1/
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until at least 3
> > > "+1" PMC
> > > > > > > votes are cast
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Instruction for checking items on the checklist:
> > > > > > > https://sedona.apache.org/community/vote/
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > We recommend you use this Jupyter notebook on MyBinder to
> perform
> > > this
> > > > > > > task:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > >
> >
> https://mybinder.org/v2/gh/jiayuasu/sedona-tools/HEAD?labpath=binder%2Fverify-release.ipynb
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > **Please vote accordingly and you must provide your checklist
> for
> > > your
> > > > > > > vote**.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Checklist:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [ ] Download links are valid.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [ ] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [ ] DISCLAIMER is included.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [ ] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the
> current
> > > > > > release.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > For a detailed checklist  please refer to:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/Incubator+Release+Checklist
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > Mo Sarwat
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Hälsningar,
> > Martin
> >
>


-- 
Hälsningar,
Martin

Reply via email to