Martin, That sounds like a good idea - thanks for the proposal. But, we first need to consider the following:
1. Make sure that will not break other components in Sedona 2. The speed of using SIS is at least the same as GeoTools. Better if faster for sure If those 2 points are covered, I believe we can go ahead with migration to SIS. We will definitely love to have you as a Sedona contributor 😊 Thanks, Mo On Fri, Dec 9, 2022 at 6:01 AM Martin Desruisseaux < martin.desruisse...@geomatys.com> wrote: > Hello all > > The Sedona root pom.xml file declares some GeoTools modules as > dependencies that user must add themselves [1]. But I do not know if > those dependencies are optional. Can Sedona works without them, as > requested by [2]? Alternatively, would it be conceivable to replace them > by Apache SIS [3]? The GeoTools modules that are used seems to be for > referencing services and GeoTIFF support, both of them being services > offered by Apache SIS as well. The API for referencing services should > be similar, making transition easier. > > Is there any interest for such migration? If yes, I would be glad to help. > > Martin > > [1] > https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/blob/5c0f92701b45d49dbab78a5366776e30b0fef834/pom.xml#L135 > [2]https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#optional > [3]https://sis.apache.org/ >
