jiayuasu commented on code in PR #862:
URL: https://github.com/apache/sedona/pull/862#discussion_r1228997198


##########
common/src/main/java/org/apache/sedona/common/Functions.java:
##########
@@ -881,6 +881,38 @@ public static Integer nRings(Geometry geometry) throws 
Exception {
         return numRings;
     }
 
+    public static Geometry translate(Geometry geometry, double deltaX, double 
deltaY, double deltaZ) {
+        if (!geometry.isEmpty()) {
+            if (geometry instanceof GeometryCollection) {
+                GeometryCollection geometryCollection = (GeometryCollection) 
geometry;

Review Comment:
   On this regard, I think the approach used in ST_Force3D are actually better 
since it does not need to fetch individual geometries.
   
   In addition, I noticed that ST_Force3D does not have test cases for 
GeomtryCollection/MultiPolygon and such. Would you please confirm ST_Force3D 
works for these cases as well?



##########
common/src/main/java/org/apache/sedona/common/Functions.java:
##########
@@ -881,6 +881,38 @@ public static Integer nRings(Geometry geometry) throws 
Exception {
         return numRings;
     }
 
+    public static Geometry translate(Geometry geometry, double deltaX, double 
deltaY, double deltaZ) {
+        if (!geometry.isEmpty()) {
+            if (geometry instanceof GeometryCollection) {
+                GeometryCollection geometryCollection = (GeometryCollection) 
geometry;

Review Comment:
   On this regard, I think the approach used in ST_Force3D is actually better 
since it does not need to fetch individual geometries.
   
   In addition, I noticed that ST_Force3D does not have test cases for 
GeomtryCollection/MultiPolygon and such. Would you please confirm ST_Force3D 
works for these cases as well?



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to