Named filter is difficult to understand and the “named” has different 
implications.

If you want to support (either now or in the future) more flexible filtering 
such as wildcard, I suggest to use the name like objectFilter.
But if you don’t want to support wildcard and only allow one object path, use 
objectName or objectPath.

Thanks,
Haifeng

From: Colin Ma [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Colin Ma
Sent: Tuesday, April 5, 2016 2:03 PM
To: Chen, Haifeng <[email protected]>; Ma, Junjie <[email protected]>; 
sentry <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Review Request 45728: SENTRY-1176: Update thrift API for export 
with specific auth object

This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: 
https://reviews.apache.org/r/45728/



On April 5th, 2016, 5:45 a.m. UTC, Jerry Chen wrote:
sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/main/resources/sentry_policy_service.thrift<https://reviews.apache.org/r/45728/diff/1/?file=1325581#file1325581line244>
 (Diff revision 1)


244


3: optional string authObjectFilter # filter for specific auth object


My oppinion authObjectFilter is not quite a good name here. Naming suggestions:

objectName

objectPath

how about named filter?


- Colin


On April 5th, 2016, 3:53 a.m. UTC, Colin Ma wrote:
Review request for sentry.
By Colin Ma.

Updated April 5, 2016, 3:53 a.m.
Repository: sentry
Description

Update thrift API for export with specific auth object


Diffs

  *   
sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/gen/thrift/gen-javabean/org/apache/sentry/provider/db/service/thrift/TSentryExportMappingDataRequest.java
 (8145252)
  *   
sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/main/resources/sentry_policy_service.thrift
 (40889e8)

View Diff<https://reviews.apache.org/r/45728/diff/>


Reply via email to