> On May 8, 2016, 4:35 a.m., Gregory Chanan wrote:
> > sentry-provider/sentry-provider-common/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/provider/common/CacheProvider.java,
> >  line 23
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/46909/diff/6/?file=1375790#file1375790line23>
> >
> >     Shouldn't this be CacheProviderBackend and extend ProviderBackend?  
> > Just have it skip validation or maybe even better throw an exception if 
> > someone tries to validate e.g. "Cache itself does not validate, that is the 
> > responsibility of the builder of the cache."
> 
> Ashish Singh wrote:
>     This is not an issue right, if we need to do this, we can do it in a 
> follow up JIRA.

Sure, please file a jira and reply to it here so we don't forget.


> On May 8, 2016, 4:35 a.m., Gregory Chanan wrote:
> > sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/provider/db/generic/UpdatableCache.java,
> >  line 115
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/46909/diff/6/?file=1375793#file1375793line115>
> >
> >     did you want to deal with the fact that the privilege convertor are 
> > probably validating?  Maybe the nicest way to do that is to take a factory 
> > in the generic provider backend with a boolean for validation or whatever.
> 
> Ashish Singh wrote:
>     I think we can have this in a follow up JIRA. If that sounds OK to you I 
> will file a JIRA.

Sure, please create the jira and link it here.


> On May 8, 2016, 4:35 a.m., Gregory Chanan wrote:
> > sentry-provider/sentry-provider-file/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/provider/file/SimpleFileProviderBackend.java,
> >  line 61
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/46909/diff/6/?file=1375797#file1375797line61>
> >
> >     I think it's cleaner if you just use the CacheProvider(Backend) instead 
> > of deriving.  Prefer composition over inheritance.
> 
> Ashish Singh wrote:
>     Similar to somewhere above, not an issue, we can deal this refactoring in 
> a follow up JIRA.

Sounds good, same as my comment above, file a jira now and link it.


> On May 8, 2016, 4:35 a.m., Gregory Chanan wrote:
> > sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/provider/db/generic/SentryGenericProviderBackend.java,
> >  line 49
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/46909/diff/6/?file=1375792#file1375792line49>
> >
> >     you shouldn't need direct access to the cache here.  Use a 
> > CacheProviderBackend.
> 
> Ashish Singh wrote:
>     Required to make sure we block on first cache loading.

Is this still true?  I suggested a different way of handling the blocking below.


- Gregory


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/46909/#review132161
-----------------------------------------------------------


On May 12, 2016, 9:03 a.m., Ashish Singh wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/46909/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 12, 2016, 9:03 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for sentry, Dapeng Sun, Gregory Chanan, Hao Hao, and Sravya 
> Tirukkovalur.
> 
> 
> Bugs: SENTRY-1229
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1229
> 
> 
> Repository: sentry
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> SENTRY-1229: Add caching to SentryGenericProviderBackend.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> sentry-provider/sentry-provider-common/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/provider/common/CacheProvider.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> sentry-provider/sentry-provider-common/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/provider/common/ProviderBackend.java
>  ffd3af4903dd59f37ea1ff4a55138742fdfa74da 
>   
> sentry-provider/sentry-provider-common/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/provider/common/TableCache.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/provider/db/generic/SentryGenericProviderBackend.java
>  222b6fd530a0e26ea625d1be0fd68b0828558316 
>   
> sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/provider/db/generic/UpdatableCache.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/provider/db/generic/service/thrift/SentryGenericServiceClient.java
>  76ff15b91fddad6b5aa429d2439eb2a5086544d7 
>   
> sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/provider/db/generic/service/thrift/SentryGenericServiceClientDefaultImpl.java
>  74b6963ab4015521462fb3c25559d0d12292424f 
>   
> sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/service/thrift/ServiceConstants.java
>  00e3fbde76ebf84704ee110adfca30869845a7b8 
>   
> sentry-provider/sentry-provider-file/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/provider/file/SimpleFileProviderBackend.java
>  3c0e349443e3917812b46aa4547c3cab14dab052 
>   
> sentry-tests/sentry-tests-kafka/src/test/java/org/apache/sentry/tests/e2e/kafka/AbstractKafkaSentryTestBase.java
>  a2cfa28da2af548a872ec0d2e5620ae1c27041b3 
>   
> sentry-tests/sentry-tests-kafka/src/test/java/org/apache/sentry/tests/e2e/kafka/TestAuthorize.java
>  250522ed33394a667b1a0d6c47c68b210e0214a3 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/46909/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Extended Kafka e2e tests. Will be running perf tests for Kafka-Sentry 
> integration with caching turned on.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ashish Singh
> 
>

Reply via email to