> On Oct. 25, 2016, 9:07 p.m., Anne Yu wrote:
> > sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/service/thrift/SentryServiceClientFactory.java,
> >  line 35
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/53175/diff/1/?file=1545318#file1545318line35>
> >
> >     This is very nice. Maybe we can make e2e tests use pool based clients 
> > by default.
> 
> Li Li wrote:
>     Now we want to use the original model - non pool model which is used by 
> current sentry clients (e.g. impala), so our e2e tests should focused in non 
> pool as well.

OIC. Thanks for clarification.


- Anne


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/53175/#review153822
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Oct. 25, 2016, 8:20 p.m., Li Li wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/53175/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 25, 2016, 8:20 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for sentry, Alexander Kolbasov, Anne Yu, Hao Hao, Lenni Kuff, 
> and Sravya Tirukkovalur.
> 
> 
> Repository: sentry
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Currently sentry clients e.g. impala uses non pool model 
> (SentryPolicyServiceClientDefaultImpl), thus it's better to keep the non pool 
> model for those clients to avoid unnecessary incompatible issues.
> Also the current pool model (PoolClientInvocationHandler) does not manage the 
> opening connections very well. e.g. Opening connections with failed servers 
> should be closed promptly.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/service/thrift/SentryServiceClientFactory.java
>  9e90af8f5b638d346e3f48405441ad97b9ef09ad 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/53175/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Li Li
> 
>

Reply via email to