> On May 12, 2017, 3:06 p.m., Na Li wrote:
> > sentry-core/sentry-core-common/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/core/common/transport/SentryClientTransportConstants.java
> > Line 104 (original), 104 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/59212/diff/1/?file=1716299#file1716299line104>
> >
> >     Where is "sentry.service.client.connection.loadbalance" used to 
> > configure the client? Is it in testing script? I cannot find it.
> >     
> >     If the caller and the execution both use SENTRY_CLIENT_LOAD_BALANCING, 
> > then we don't have this issue.

It is the configuration that has to be configured for the clients to akip load 
balancing. "sentry.service.client.connection.loadbalance" is configured in 
config files which sentry clients read. With out this fix the client will look 
for " sentry.service.client.connection.loadbalance" in the config file and will 
never find the configuration.


- kalyan kumar


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/59212/#review174795
-----------------------------------------------------------


On May 11, 2017, 11:22 p.m., kalyan kumar kalvagadda wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/59212/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 11, 2017, 11:22 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for sentry and Alexander Kolbasov.
> 
> 
> Bugs: SENTRY-1763
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1763
> 
> 
> Repository: sentry
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> There is a extra space in the config string with this issue configuration 
> will not match and always default behavior is seen.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> sentry-core/sentry-core-common/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/core/common/transport/SentryClientTransportConstants.java
>  c0768f9 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/59212/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> kalyan kumar kalvagadda
> 
>

Reply via email to