+1 I agree. -Kalyan
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 3:58 AM, Colm O hEigeartaigh <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 - makes sense. > > Colm. > > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 8:09 PM, Sergio Pena <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Sounds interesting Sasha. > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > I took a look at the # of commits between 1.7.0 and master and there are > > currently 154 new commits on master. This is good enough to do a release > > for Sentry. > > > > About Sentry HA, it makes sense to move this work to a major Sentry > > release, such as 2.0 due to incompatibility changes that it is bringing. > > The use of Hive notifications logs requires us to support Hive 2.x > > (probably next 2.3 release), and it would be interesting to start the > > support of Hive Authorization V2 API that brings more fine-granularity > > permissions including column masking and row filtering. > > > > Anyway, Hive 2.x and Sentry HA might bring more good stuff to Sentry and > do > > it on a 2.x release makes more sense. > > > > - Sergio > > > > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 11:55 AM, Alexander Kolbasov <[email protected] > > > > wrote: > > > > > I would like to start a preliminary discussion about the new Sentry > > > release. To make this interesting, I suggest to consider thinking about > > two > > > releases. > > > > > > 1) There are a lot of accumulated fixes since 1.7. IMO it would be > useful > > > to release those as 1.8 release. > > > 2) Sentry HA includes a large number of changes plus it introduces > > > dependency on newer Hive features, so it is worth considering moving > this > > > work into 2.0 release. > > > > > > Any thoughts on this? > > > > > > - Alex > > > > > > -- > Colm O hEigeartaigh > > Talend Community Coder > http://coders.talend.com >
