Fine with me.

Colm.

On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 10:09 PM, Kalyan Kumar Kalvagadda <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Sergio,
>
> I happened to get it touch with the person who is working these changes. I
> said he will be submitting the changes for review end of next week.
> I feel it is better to have these changes in Sentry 2.0 as these changes
> support new version of Solr. These changes might not be backward
> compatible.
>
> Such changes are the good candidates for a major release.
>
>
> -Kalyan
>
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 3:54 PM, Sergio Pena <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Would these items be ready by 1.8.0? Seems it would take more time and
> > delay the 1.8.0 release. Colm, do you think we can move these to the next
> > release on 2.0?
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 6:56 AM, Kalyan Kumar Kalvagadda <
> > [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Yes, There is been work going on.They are expected to be 1.8.0. There
> > will
> > > be patches submitted for these jira's soon.
> > >
> > > -Kalyan
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 6:50 AM, Colm O hEigeartaigh <
> [email protected]
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks. Is there any work ongoing for these issues? Is it expected to
> > be
> > > > done for 1.8.0?
> > > >
> > > > Colm.
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 12:46 PM, Kalyan Kumar Kalvagadda <
> > > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Hello Colm,
> > > >>
> > > >> Here are the jira's for the same.
> > > >>
> > > >> SENTRY-1475 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1475>
> > > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1475>
> > > >> SENTRY-1117 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1117>
> > > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1117>
> > > >> SENTRY-1480 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1480>
> > > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1480>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> -Kalyan
> > > >>
> > > >> On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 3:43 AM, Colm O hEigeartaigh <
> > > [email protected]>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> Hi Kalyan,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> That's great! Where is the work being done? Is there a JIRA to
> track
> > > it?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Colm.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 10:31 PM, Kalyan Kumar Kalvagadda <
> > > >>> [email protected]> wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> > Colm,
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > There is work under progress to integrate sentry with the new
> > > >>> Authorization
> > > >>> > framework in Solr.
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > -Kalyan
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 3:47 PM, Alexander Kolbasov <
> > > >>> [email protected]>
> > > >>> > wrote:
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > > Are there any Solr people here who can comment? Should we ping
> > > >>> someone
> > > >>> > from
> > > >>> > > Solr?
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>> > > On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 9:36 AM, Colm O hEigeartaigh <
> > > >>> > [email protected]>
> > > >>> > > wrote:
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>> > > > As a corollary of this question, I don't believe the Sentry
> > Solr
> > > >>> code
> > > >>> > > will
> > > >>> > > > work with any version of Solr post 4.10.x. As Solr is
> currently
> > > on
> > > >>> > > 6.6.0, I
> > > >>> > > > wonder what the point is of keeping this code in future
> > releases
> > > >>> unless
> > > >>> > > it
> > > >>> > > > is updated to work with a more current version of Solr?
> > > >>> > > >
> > > >>> > > > Colm.
> > > >>> > > >
> > > >>> > > > On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Colm O hEigeartaigh <
> > > >>> > > [email protected]
> > > >>> > > > >
> > > >>> > > > wrote:
> > > >>> > > >
> > > >>> > > > > Hi all,
> > > >>> > > > >
> > > >>> > > > > Is there a reason we don't offer an implementation of the
> > Solr
> > > >>> > > > > AuthorizationPlugin?
> > > >>> > > > >
> > > >>> > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Rule-
> > > >>> > > > > Based+Authorization+Plugin
> > > >>> > > > >
> > > >>> > > > > Enabling Sentry authorization would then be a simple matter
> > of
> > > >>> > > specifying
> > > >>> > > > > the plugin in the authorization part of the security.json.
> > This
> > > >>> is
> > > >>> > the
> > > >>> > > > > approach Apache Ranger follows.
> > > >>> > > > >
> > > >>> > > > > Colm.
> > > >>> > > > >
> > > >>> > > > >
> > > >>> > > > > --
> > > >>> > > > > Colm O hEigeartaigh
> > > >>> > > > >
> > > >>> > > > > Talend Community Coder
> > > >>> > > > > http://coders.talend.com
> > > >>> > > > >
> > > >>> > > >
> > > >>> > > >
> > > >>> > > >
> > > >>> > > > --
> > > >>> > > > Colm O hEigeartaigh
> > > >>> > > >
> > > >>> > > > Talend Community Coder
> > > >>> > > > http://coders.talend.com
> > > >>> > > >
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>> >
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> --
> > > >>> Colm O hEigeartaigh
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Talend Community Coder
> > > >>> http://coders.talend.com
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Colm O hEigeartaigh
> > > >
> > > > Talend Community Coder
> > > > http://coders.talend.com
> > > >
> > >
> >
>



-- 
Colm O hEigeartaigh

Talend Community Coder
http://coders.talend.com

Reply via email to