> On Aug. 29, 2018, 1:28 p.m., kalyan kumar kalvagadda wrote:
> > sentry-hdfs/sentry-hdfs-service/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/hdfs/PathImageRetriever.java
> > Lines 52-53 (original), 54-71 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/68547/diff/1/?file=2078642#file2078642line54>
> >
> >     General comment on the solution. From the description you are trying 
> > efficiently serve the full update request while is received immediatly 
> > after the timeout failure. If not please explain other cases you are trying 
> > to solve.
> >     
> >     
> >     1. With this approach sentry would always store a full paths update all 
> > the time. This will increase the memory foot print of sentry. This is not 
> > good.
> >     
> >     2. Why is thsi logic added only for Path updates but not permission 
> > updates.
> >     
> >     3. I would prefer you differ this patch till SENTRY-2287 is fixed. Once 
> > patch for SENTRY-2287 is committed you will have place holder to reset the 
> > cache when the NN acknowledges that it received full update. That wat the 
> > cache is held only short period.
> 
> Arjun Mishra wrote:
>     Kalyan, agreed that it would be good to clear the cache once NN 
> acknoledges the receipt of udpates, but that could be worked on as a part of 
> a different ticket. I think this will significantly help with issues where NN 
> request timeout triggers another fetch from Sentry Db. The increase to heap 
> size will be needed but the benefits outway the problem. Let me know your 
> thoughts. 
>     
>     I have added Perm Update cache too. I can also add a configuration to 
> enable path or perm caching

We need to really carefull before introducing caching. When there we know that 
higher timeout value avaoid this failure there is no hurry in putting a 
solution that increases the memory foot print and other potential bugs.


- kalyan kumar


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/68547/#review208090
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Aug. 29, 2018, 7:04 p.m., Arjun Mishra wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/68547/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 29, 2018, 7:04 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for sentry, kalyan kumar kalvagadda, Na Li, and Sergio Pena.
> 
> 
> Bugs: SENTRY-2370
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-2370
> 
> 
> Repository: sentry
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> When NN requests path updates from sentry and if it exceeds the time 
> threshold, on consecutive attempts sentry will attempt to fetch the full 
> update from scratch. Instead it should cache it and update the cache before 
> sending it to NN
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> sentry-hdfs/sentry-hdfs-common/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/hdfs/ImageRetriever.java
>  11b75411d 
>   
> sentry-hdfs/sentry-hdfs-service/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/hdfs/DBUpdateForwarder.java
>  08b16a4df 
>   
> sentry-hdfs/sentry-hdfs-service/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/hdfs/PathImageRetriever.java
>  2b1618134 
>   
> sentry-hdfs/sentry-hdfs-service/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/hdfs/PermImageRetriever.java
>  f3a2d5028 
>   
> sentry-hdfs/sentry-hdfs-service/src/test/java/org/apache/sentry/hdfs/TestDBUpdateForwarder.java
>  f86ce6f83 
>   
> sentry-hdfs/sentry-hdfs-service/src/test/java/org/apache/sentry/hdfs/TestImageRetriever.java
>  fb42b279a 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/68547/diff/2/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Arjun Mishra
> 
>

Reply via email to