-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/69987/#review212874
-----------------------------------------------------------




sentry-binding/sentry-binding-hive/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/binding/util/SentryAuthorizerUtil.java
Line 283 (original), 285 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/69987/#comment298763>

    Use PathUtils#parseLocalURI method if uri.getScheme is null to 
re-intantiate the object. That should work


- Arjun Mishra


On Feb. 14, 2019, 4:36 p.m., Haley Reeve wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/69987/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 14, 2019, 4:36 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for sentry, Arjun Mishra, kalyan kumar kalvagadda, and Na Li.
> 
> 
> Repository: sentry
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> The "show grant role" logic tries to use a URI's scheme to tell whether it's 
> a local URI or a DFS URI. However, it's valid for the scheme to be undefined. 
> In that case Sentry throws a NPE because it's trying to access a null scheme.
> 
> The logic has been updated to instead use the default filesystem set in the 
> "fs.defaultFS" property if the scheme is not defined.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> sentry-binding/sentry-binding-hive/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/binding/hive/authz/DefaultSentryAccessController.java
>  94783fa 
>   
> sentry-binding/sentry-binding-hive/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/binding/util/SentryAuthorizerUtil.java
>  5996b6c 
>   
> sentry-tests/sentry-tests-hive/src/test/java/org/apache/sentry/tests/e2e/dbprovider/TestDatabaseProvider.java
>  6a7c1f3 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/69987/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Created and ran testShowGrantWithNullScheme() unit test. Checked that test 
> fails without code change, and succeeds with code change.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Haley Reeve
> 
>

Reply via email to