Hi Greg,

The process of bumping release number will be done as part of the release 
subtasks.   The official Apache release process calls for 2 weeks notice.   It 
may not be needed for Sentry, but I am also out of the office next week :))  So 
we decided to stick to the recommended  wait-out.

For your patch,  Sravya's recent commit (5862bbe) has updated the version to 
1.4.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT.  If you update your dependency to that, it will keep 
you stable and up-to-date until 1.4.0 is released.

Respectfully,
Tuong 


On Thursday, July 24, 2014 1:12 PM, Gregory Chanan <[email protected]> wrote:
  


Hi Tuong,

Thanks for taking this on, we definitely appreciate all the effort!

One thing I haven't seen discussed is what to do about dependency versions
-- are we planning to bump to released versions for 1.4.0, like we did in
1.3.0 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-171)?
One reason I'm asking is because of SENTRY-354 (
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-354) -- I need to bump a
version number for that patch, but don't think it's appropriate until after
1.4.0 is brached.  To avoid these sorts of issues where trunk progress is
stalled while we "help keep trunk stable", I generally prefer to branch
sooner rather  than later.  Could you describe why you want to wait 2 weeks?

Thanks,
Greg




On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 6:21 PM, Tuong Tr. <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Sentry Community,
>
> As you may know,  we are getting ready to release Sentry 1.4.0.
> Our plan is to branch on Tuesday, August 5th.
>
> There are currently about 24 unresolved JIRAs that have
> fix-version as 1.4.0.     By EOD today, I will move all those to the next
> release.
> If you would like to commit
> any of these JIRAs into 1.4.0 release,  you will need to change the
> fix-version back to
> 1.4.0.
>
> Please help keep trunk
> stable in the next 2 weeks so we can have a smooth release.
>
> SENTRY-365 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-356) has been
> created to track the release activity.
>
>
> Let me know if you any question or
> suggestion.
>
> Respectfully,
> Tuong

Reply via email to