-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25377/#review53761
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


LGTM. One minor comment: I think we should also add test cases where our 
roleset/ groups are a subset of available ones. So that we can actually make 
sure they are being filtered out? Please feel free to file a follow on jira if 
you agree. Thanks!

- Sravya Tirukkovalur


On Sept. 12, 2014, 4:22 a.m., Prasad Mujumdar wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/25377/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 12, 2014, 4:22 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for sentry, Arun Suresh and Sravya Tirukkovalur.
> 
> 
> Bugs: SENTRY-359
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-359
> 
> 
> Repository: sentry
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> New thirft RPC to fetch all the privileges for the given set of authorizable 
> objects
> Also the grant privileges API retuns the new grant object created.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/provider/db/service/persistent/SentryStore.java
>  718306d 
>   
> sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/provider/db/service/thrift/SentryPolicyServiceClient.java
>  6252051 
>   
> sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/provider/db/service/thrift/SentryPolicyStoreProcessor.java
>  070c494 
>   
> sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/main/resources/sentry_policy_service.thrift
>  b14616b 
>   
> sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/test/java/org/apache/sentry/provider/db/service/thrift/TestSentryServiceIntegration.java
>  5244094 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25377/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Added new test cases.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Prasad Mujumdar
> 
>

Reply via email to