Hi All, We just finished this monthly hangout. The summary of our discussion today:
- Reviewed the design of SENTRY-711: “Implement grant user to role”: Define the objective of this feature is to handle: Support grant role to a user only; and “support grant privilege to group and user” should be a separate issue. Design doc will be updated accordingly. - Discussed the issue of SENTRY-1007: "Sentry column-level performance for wide tables": Located two separate improvement should be addressed: reduce RPC calls for each query, and cache the privilege. Jiras will be filed to track the issues. - Discussed the design of SENTRY-999: "Refactor the sentry to integrate with external components." Define the objective of this feature is to reduce the redundant implementation for client integration with generic model through thrift API. Design doc will be updated accordingly. Thanks! Best, Hao On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 10:04 PM, Ma, Junjie <[email protected]> wrote: > > For the "Refactor the sentry to integrate with external components", the > initial patch for the Privilege refactor is finished(SENTRY-1004). > We can check the patch before discussion. > > Best regards, > > Colin Ma(Ma Jun Jie) > > -----Original Message----- > From: Hao Hao [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2016 4:50 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Janaury hangout > > Hi Anne, > > Sure, we can add that to our discussion as well. Thanks a lot for > reminding! > > Best, > Hao > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Anne Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Haohao, > > > > There is potentially one more: > > > > SENTRY-1007: Performance issue for column level privileges: when the > > table includes thousands of columns or partitions. (for example 8k). > > Some commands, like select * from table will issue thousands of > > backend db queries, instead of one query, so to user, the query seems > > to freeze for a long time. > > > > Thanks, > > Anne > > > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 5:57 PM, Hao Hao <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Great, thanks Colin. Then here is the proposed agenda: > > > > > > 1. Review and discuss the design of SENTRY-711: “Implement grant > > > user to role”. (15 mins) 2. Review and discuss the design of > > > SENTRY-999: "Refactor the sentry to integrate with external > > > components." (15 mins) > > > > > > > > > Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks! > > > > > > Best, > > > Hao > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 5:51 PM, Ma, Junjie <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > I want to add another discussion for SENTRY-999: Refactor the > > > > sentry to integrate with external components quickly. It should be > > > > another > > > important > > > > change for Sentry to be a common authorization framework. > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > Colin Ma(Ma Jun Jie) > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Hao Hao [mailto:[email protected]] > > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2016 9:39 AM > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > Subject: Janaury hangout > > > > > > > > Hi folks, > > > > > > > > We may have our monthly hangout this coming Thursday. Any > > > > volunteers > > who > > > > would like to form an agenda and lead the conversation? If not, I > > suggest > > > > we can do review and dicsuss the design proposed by Junjie for > > > Sentry-711: > > > > “Implement grant user to role”, which is an important feature we > > > > may > > want > > > > to have? Thanks! > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > Hao > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Thanks, > > Anne > > >
