On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 7:44 AM, Bert Huijben <[email protected]> wrote:

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ivan Zhakov [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: woensdag 26 augustus 2015 14:21
> > To: Bert Huijben <[email protected]>
> > Cc: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: Serf WWW
> >
> > On 26 August 2015 at 15:10, Bert Huijben <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >         Hi Ivan,
> > >
> > > Infra would like to know what kind of web setup we would like.
> > >
> > > Do we want CMS or SvnPubSub?
> > > (Let's not consider the git variants ;-))
> > >
> > Personally I prefer to use vanilla HTML for websites instead of
> > dealing with CMS systems. So svnpubsub looks better option for me (I
> > assume that svnpubsub supports server-side includes like we use in
> > Subversion).
>

Sure.

As I mentioned elsewhere, I believe the current CMS system may be
deprecated, due to lack of maintainers. So choosing svnpubsub is solid.


>
> ^/serf
> And ^/serf/site/publish
>
> Are created in the repository and the serf group should have commit access
> to them.
>
> The request to 'svnadmin load' our history isn't handled yet, so please do
> not create 'trunk', 'tags' and 'branches' subdirectories or loading the
> dumpfile won't work.
>
>
> I hope the svnpubsub support is handled faster than the load request.
>

Infra deals with a couple hundred projects. I think we can give them a
couple days or so :-P

Cheers,
-g

Reply via email to