On 26 August 2015 at 18:48, Bert Huijben <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ivan,
>
> An initial (test?) import has been completed. See
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SERF/
>
I see. It's only test import. I've already installed test JIRA on VM
and improved my conversion program.
The first question what workflow we're going to use. Google Code we
have the following statuses:
[[
New
Fixed
WontFix
Accepted
Started
Invalid
Verified
Done
Duplicate
]]
While JIRA is very flexible and could adapted to any workflow I'm
inclined to choose simple way and map all these statuses to "OPEN" and
"RESOLVED":
[[
case "New":
return "OPEN";
case "Fixed":
return "CLOSED";
case "WontFix":
return "CLOSED";
case "Accepted":
return "OPEN";
case "Started":
return "OPEN";
case "Invalid":
return "CLOSED";
case "Verified":
return "CLOSED";
case "Done":
return "CLOSED";
case "Duplicate":
return "CLOSED";
]]]
Please note that CLOSED issues cannot be edited.
With the different "resolutions":
[[[
case "Fixed": return "Fixed";
case "Invalid": return "Invalid";
case "WontFix": return "Won't Fix";
case "Duplicate": return "Duplicate";
case "New":
case "Started":
case "Accepted":
return "";
case "REMIND": return "REMIND";
case "Verified":
return "Fixed";
case "Done":
return "Fixed";
]]]
Does it make sense or we want to customize JIRA workflow to match Google Code?
--
Ivan Zhakov
