Hi Bert, Op woensdag 24 augustus 2016 heeft Bert Huijben <b...@qqmail.nl> het volgende geschreven:
> Hi, > > I think we should really try to get serf back to being releasable. The last > release was handled by Lieven before we joined the ASF and I have not been > involved with the release process. Many things have changed and we now have > buildbots, etc. > > I think the 1.3.x branch is +- releasable as is. Branko mentioned several > weeks ago that he might have some patches to help improve support on OS/X. > If he has useful patches we could wait, or try releasing again a few weeks > later. > > What is still needed? OpenSSL 1.1.x support was already merged if I > remember > correctly. > Is there some script available to do the releasing? Or should I try to > script something and try to create an initial tarball for further review? > > > >From an earlier mail on this list, the procedure I've always used: " The release procedure consists of: 1. Preparing the release notes on trunk, merging them to,the branch 2. Creating a release tag based on the branch 3. Running the dist.sh script on a Mac/Linux pc 4. manually verifying the tarballs generated by the script 5. uploading the tarballs 6. manually verifying SHA1 after upload 7. sending a relelase announcement mail Dist.sh is already updated to point to the new svn repo, and as far as I can see in the code it should work fine. This is of course only the act of creating and publishing the tarball, we should add a voting step and define where/how to,upload the tarballs, wait for sync to dist mirror ... " > Trunk/1.4 will probably need a bit more work, but if we have a release > process going things should be a bit easier. > The major TODO there would be to review what parts of the HTTP/2 support > should be made private. > > > As a personal deadline: I would like to see some releases before the > October > Subversion hackathon in Berlin. That would be in time to announce the > release with the next board report. > But if we can do it in the next weeks...? I can do a review of the serf 1.3.x changes, most of them are (still) fine last I checked. Lieven > Thanks, > Bert > >
