On 17 June 2014 at 12:08, Michael -O <1983-01...@gmx.net> wrote: > Is that really good to do? > > We have several host which would not work anymore with such a fix. Here are > two usecases: > > 1. app.company.com CNAME, RDNS servername.company.net, HTTP/app.company.com > exist. > 2. Load balancing with a canonical hostname with a SPN bound to one service > account and not machine account. E.g., our HTTP proxy works that way. I have > tested that config with Lieven several time ago with GSS-API. > > I've reverted this change in r1831196. Thanks for review!
-- Ivan Zhakov
