Den ons 6 aug. 2025 kl 12:21 skrev Branko Čibej <br...@apache.org>:

> On 6. 8. 25 11:53, Daniel Sahlberg wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I discovered that the repository contains a bunch of build scripts in the
> > /tools/buildbot directory[1].
> >
> > I assume these were used by builders in ASF's buildbot[2] but I have
> never
> > seen any builds for Serf there - I assume it wasn't migrated when ASF
> > updated buildbot a few years ago.
> >
> > Currently we use GitHub Actions (it seems we don't have a Macos build but
> > it should be easy enough to borrow from Subversion)
>
> We do, too have a macOS build. :-D Just not very automated.
>
> I don't see a GHA for macOS in Subversion. Is is somewhere else than on
> trunk?
>

It is part of the matrix in the cmake.yml[1], see for example:

https://github.com/apache/subversion/actions/runs/16766049452/job/47471177057#step:6:26

I'm keen on merging the linux-cmake.yml and windows-cmake.yml for Serf
similar to Subversion's way of setting up the GHAs but we could add a
macos-cmake.yml as well.


[1]
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/trunk/.github/workflows/cmake.yml


> >   so I think there isn't
> > any interest in getting buildbot up again. We don't have support for
> > Solaris but in reality I don't think that is a big problem.
>
> It is quite a problem because we have Solaris-specific code (at least in
> SConstruct, if not elsewhere), so it would not be too bad if we could
> test that. I tried setting up a Solaris VM in KVM, but no luck there ...
> evidently my sparc emulation wasn't.[1]
>
> > Instead of having the scripts rotting in the repository, I suggest to
> > remove it completely. It is easy enough to go back in history if someone
> > wants to take a look.
>
> I'd just add a README that those scripts are obsolete and not used. That
> makes them easier to find, since you don't have to know that they're
> somewhere in the history.
>

Ok, willdo.


>
> -- Brane
>
> [1] "Wasn't what?" said Piglet. "It just wasn't," said Pooh.
>

Cheers,
Daniel

Reply via email to