Den ons 6 aug. 2025 kl 12:21 skrev Branko Čibej <br...@apache.org>: > On 6. 8. 25 11:53, Daniel Sahlberg wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I discovered that the repository contains a bunch of build scripts in the > > /tools/buildbot directory[1]. > > > > I assume these were used by builders in ASF's buildbot[2] but I have > never > > seen any builds for Serf there - I assume it wasn't migrated when ASF > > updated buildbot a few years ago. > > > > Currently we use GitHub Actions (it seems we don't have a Macos build but > > it should be easy enough to borrow from Subversion) > > We do, too have a macOS build. :-D Just not very automated. > > I don't see a GHA for macOS in Subversion. Is is somewhere else than on > trunk? >
It is part of the matrix in the cmake.yml[1], see for example: https://github.com/apache/subversion/actions/runs/16766049452/job/47471177057#step:6:26 I'm keen on merging the linux-cmake.yml and windows-cmake.yml for Serf similar to Subversion's way of setting up the GHAs but we could add a macos-cmake.yml as well. [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/trunk/.github/workflows/cmake.yml > > so I think there isn't > > any interest in getting buildbot up again. We don't have support for > > Solaris but in reality I don't think that is a big problem. > > It is quite a problem because we have Solaris-specific code (at least in > SConstruct, if not elsewhere), so it would not be too bad if we could > test that. I tried setting up a Solaris VM in KVM, but no luck there ... > evidently my sparc emulation wasn't.[1] > > > Instead of having the scripts rotting in the repository, I suggest to > > remove it completely. It is easy enough to go back in history if someone > > wants to take a look. > > I'd just add a README that those scripts are obsolete and not used. That > makes them easier to find, since you don't have to know that they're > somewhere in the history. > Ok, willdo. > > -- Brane > > [1] "Wasn't what?" said Piglet. "It just wasn't," said Pooh. > Cheers, Daniel