i think it's impossible that we wait their decision and develop plan...... 2018-06-29 9:00 GMT+08:00 YangYongZheng <342906...@qq.com>:
> I think we can communicate with protostuff let them know what we need; > If they feel unnecessary, we may extend jackson protobuf plugin in order > to support this. > > > Best Regards! > YangYongZheng > > -----邮件原件----- > 发件人: wjm wjm [mailto:zzz...@gmail.com] > 发送时间: 2018年6月28日 16:46 > 收件人: dev@servicecomb.apache.org > 主题: about protobuf codec switch from protoStuff to jackson > > protoStuff support all protobuf v3 features and very fast but protoStuff: > 1.must based on java class, can not construct from idl, this is not good > in edge. > 2.can not support customize generic class > > jackson protobuf plugin is good in other feature, but : > only support protobuf v2 features > some scenes slower than protoStuff, and others faster, it's not a big > problem, we can optimize it in the future > > if we extend jackson protobuf plugin to support protobuf v3 features we > must copy and modify source code, because there is no any plugable design > for v3 feature it's "copy and modify", we will have too many problems > > what your suggestion to resolve the problem？ > > > >
