That could be great. Well there is an issue [1] to discuss about how different LRA implementations can register participants with each other.
[1] https://github.com/eclipse/microprofile-lra/issues/17 2018-07-09 19:50 GMT+08:00 Willem Jiang <[email protected]>: > Hi Feng, > > Thanks for the information. It's could great that ServiceComb saga could be > an implementation of it. > Let's attend the Hangout and find what we can do about it. > > > Willem Jiang > > Twitter: willemjiang > Weibo: 姜宁willem > > On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 3:28 PM, Zheng Feng <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > The Long Running Action for MicroProfile ( > > https://github.com/eclipse/microprofile-lra) introduces the APIs > > for services to coordinate activities. It is a proposal in progress to > > provide the consistency guarantees in the loosely coupled services based > > environment. > > I think our current saga implementation has a very similar aim.It looks > > like a good opportunity to work with them to improve the APIs and we can > > consider a different implementation of the specification. They could > > consider to use "MicroProfile Distributed Saga" and we can discuss in the > > community. > > > > For those guys interesting with the micorprofile-lra, the following > > information could be useful: > > Zoom join url: https://eclipse.zoom.us/j/949859967 > > Chat room: https://gitter.im/eclipse/microprofile-lra > > Google group: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/microprofile > > > > We can join the Hangout every Monday (10:30pm - 11:30pm UTC+0800) > > The google doc for the Agenda: > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HBPiXpsXcQp9T8JeoT-IDs- > > EblZX1SxuTV5qjUPzwrM/edit# > > > > Thanks, > > Zheng Feng > > >
