No, What I mean is that Apollo itself is complex. It have multiple components and uses eureka for registry/discovery. So it will take a long time for booting an Apollo instance for testing, which is the problem we are facing in our test cases. The other problem is that if used in production, it will require extra man-power to maintain/setup this config center.
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 2:10 PM Zen Lin <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 to using this way to reduce load of integration testing. > > But I am also interested in what Yangbo mentioned, "apollo is too complex > a system for our use case". > My doubt is is there any way to reduce this complex, any user guide blog > for it? > > Best Regards, > --- > Zen Lin > [email protected] > Focused on Micro Service and Apache ServiceComb > > > YangYongZheng <[email protected]> 于2018年7月18日周三 上午11:24写道： > > > Yes, we only need test integration mechanism, not Apollo itself > > > > > > Best Regards! > > YangYongZheng > > > > > > -----邮件原件----- > > 发件人: Yang Bo [mailto:[email protected]] > > 发送时间: 2018年7月18日 11:13 > > 收件人: [email protected] > > 主题: Re: [DISCUSS]Simplify Dynamic Config (Apollo) Integration Test in > Java > > Chassis > > > > For the purpose of testing this is OK. But the real problem here is that > > apollo is too complex a system for our use case. > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 11:01 AM 郑扬勇 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi all： > > > We had integration with Apollo for support dynamic config in Java > > > Chassis, our CI will pull up apollo docker containers for test > > > (nobodyiam/apollo-quick-start and lijasonvip/apollodb), this step is > > > very slow and easy failed. > > > I found that we are only use apollo openapi ( > > > https://github.com/ctripcorp/apollo/wiki/Apollo%E5%BC%80%E6%94%BE%E5%B > > > 9%B3%E5%8F%B0) to get configurations from it, code below : > > > > > > private static RestTemplate rest = new RestTemplate(); > > > ResponseEntity<String> exchange = rest.exchange(composeAPI(), > > > HttpMethod.GET, entity, String.class); > > > > > > It is a general http GET request, so I think we only need start up a > > > http server and direct return a default configuration content for this > > > url in order to simulate the apollo server, that is enough. > > > > > > Any thoughts? > > > > > > Best Regards & Thanks! > > > Yangyong Zheng > > > > > > > > -- > > Best Regards, > > Yang. > > > > > > > > > -- Best Regards, Yang.
