Hi, jimin, Changed the System property fix the issue, but it looks like we have some undocument information need to updated.
Willem Jiang Twitter: willemjiang Weibo: 姜宁willem On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 11:44 AM, wjm wjm <[email protected]> wrote: > you write a local registry.yaml, but missed some important data > a easy way to fix: do not write the registry.yaml > because you test case is self invoke self, ServiceComb engine can generate > informations dynamiclly > > change: org.apache.servicecomb.saga.discovery.service.center. > ServiceCenterDiscoveryRestTransportTest#setUpLocalRegistry > > private static void setUpLocalRegistry() { > System.setProperty(LOCAL_REGISTRY_FILE_KEY,"notExistJustForceLocal"); > } > > > > 2018-07-24 11:17 GMT+08:00 Willem Jiang <[email protected]>: > > > Hi > > > > When I recovery the old saga code in the SCB-692 branch[1] , I got the > > error when running the ServiceCenterDiscoveryRestTransportTest in the > > ServiceComb Discovery module. > > It looks like the service provide already registered, but the Service > Path > > Manager cannot find the right instance. I tried to debug the code, but > > there are some points those I missed. > > > > You can reproduce the error by checking out the saga code and switch to > > SCB-692 branch. > > > > [1]https://github.com/apache/incubator-servicecomb-saga/tree/SCB-692 > > > > Willem Jiang > > > > Twitter: willemjiang > > Weibo: 姜宁willem > > >
