https://docs.spring.io/spring/docs/5.0.0.BUILD-SNAPSHOT/spring-framework-reference/html/web-reactive.html
springboot2 not bind to servlet anymore, if developers use servlet api, then can only select servlet stack if want to work both with servlet and reactive stack, must use wrapped classes so i think developers can not use javax.servlet.http.HttpSession directly 2018-07-28 8:53 GMT+08:00 Willem Jiang <[email protected]>: > I just google the Spring boot2 Spring Session and find out this[1]. > > Spring Security and Spring Session filters are configured for ASYNC, ERROR, > and REQUEST dispatcher types. > > From the description, I can assume that Spring Boot2 still support the > Servlet API even the internal code could be changed. > > [1] > https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-boot/wiki/ > Spring-Boot-2.0-Migration-Guide#servlet-filters > > > Willem Jiang > > Twitter: willemjiang > Weibo: 姜宁willem > > On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 8:52 AM, wjm wjm <[email protected]> wrote: > > > infact, in springboot2 reactive stack, it's also not compatible: > > > > - can not use servlet request and response, must switch to new class > > - can not use selvlet filters > > > > all mechanism about servlet > > > > we are similar, if customer want to use servlet stack, then use them as > > before, but if DO NOT want to bind to servlet, than must follow the new > > rule. > > > > ---------------------- > > @Override public Mono<Void> filter(ServerWebExchange exchange, > > WebFilterChain chain) { > > Mono<?> principal = this.includes.contains(Include.PRINCIPAL) ? > > exchange.getPrincipal().cast(Object.class).defaultIfEmpty(NONE) : > > Mono.just(NONE); > > Mono<?> session = this.includes.contains(Include.SESSION_ID) ? > > exchange.getSession() : Mono.just(NONE); > > > > > > 2018-07-26 22:21 GMT+08:00 Willem Jiang <[email protected]>: > > > > > For the normal user, they just want to use the session information as > > they > > > use in the web container. > > > It could be great if we can still support spring session out of box. > > > > > > > > > Willem Jiang > > > > > > Twitter: willemjiang > > > Weibo: 姜宁willem > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 10:03 PM, wjm wjm <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > java chassis invocation context is easier than session > > > > but in edge, if we provide a distributed session, that can make > manage > > > > session easier. > > > > > > > > 2018-07-26 17:58 GMT+08:00 bismy <[email protected]>: > > > > > > > > > Java Chassis now do not provide a easy session management but do > > give a > > > > > suggestion to manage it at edge service[1]. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If we need to think about Spring Session, we should think about how > > to > > > > use > > > > > Session API like HttpSession. But java chassis is not a J2EE > > > > > implementation. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do we implement a Spring Session like mechanism? > > > > > > > > > > [1]https://huaweicse.github.io/cse-java-chassis-doc/ > > > > > featured-topics/develope-microservice-using-ces/jin- > > > > > xing-ren-zheng-he-jian-quan-she-ji.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------ > > > > > 发件人: "willem.jiang"<[email protected]>; > > > > > 发送时间: 2018年7月26日(星期四) 下午5:43 > > > > > 收件人: "dev"<[email protected]>; > > > > > > > > > > 主题: Re: Spring Session Support in Java Chassis > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > After went through the code, it looks like the PR[1] was not merged > > > into > > > > > master branch. > > > > > > > > > > [1]https://github.com/vert-x3/vertx-web/pull/950 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Willem Jiang > > > > > > > > > > Twitter: willemjiang > > > > > Weibo: 姜宁willem > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 4:35 PM, wjm wjm <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > by ClusteredSessionStore, vertx can also do this > > > > > > but currently, there is no a official IMPL: > > > > > > https://github.com/vert-x3/vertx-web/issues/890 > > > > > > > > > > > > 2018-07-26 15:31 GMT+08:00 Willem Jiang <[email protected] > >: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi team, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Today I had a quick talk with the custom who is quite > interested > > > > about > > > > > > take > > > > > > > the session out from the single server to the redis cluster > with > > > the > > > > > help > > > > > > > of Spring session. In this way they can build the stateless > > > services > > > > > > > without changing any application code. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I just checked the Spring Session document, it looks like we > need > > > to > > > > > > setup > > > > > > > a filter to replace the HTTPSession from the container. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now I have a quick question about how can we integrate Spring > > > > Session > > > > > > with > > > > > > > Java-Chassis? > > > > > > > If vertx support servlet filter, we just need to do some > > > > configuration, > > > > > > > but what if vertx doesn't support servlet filter API. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any throught? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Willem Jiang > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Twitter: willemjiang > > > > > > > Weibo: 姜宁willem > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
