problem is: protobuf not allow to define List<LIst>/ List<Map>
wjm wjm <zzz...@gmail.com> 于2018年9月15日周六 上午10:27写道：
> it's not protoStuff problem.
> protoStuff not suport serialize/deserialize without class
>
> Willem Jiang <willem.ji...@gmail.com> 于2018年9月15日周六 上午10:18写道：
>
>> Hi Jimin,
>> The best way is we send a PR for protoStuff to provide the solution of
>> listList/listMap, but it may not meet the needs of our release
>> schedule.
>> I don't think maintain a fork version of protoStuff is good way to go.
>> If we can wrap the protoStuff and extends it ourselves, it may meet
>> the needs of our release schedule.
>>
>> Willem Jiang
>>
>> Twitter: willemjiang
>> Weibo: 姜宁willem
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 15, 2018 at 9:36 AM wjm wjm <zzz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > class Test {
>> > public List<List<String>> listList;
>> > public List<Map<String, String>> listMap;
>> > }
>> >
>> > the field listList/listMap is invalid in protobuf.
>> > -----------
>> >
>> > currently we process this by protoStuff runtimeSchema, runtimeSchema
>> > generated from Test class, and runtimeSchema can support the definition
>> of
>> > listList/listMap(that's protoStuff rule, not protobuf rule)
>> > but because there are no classes in Edge service, currently we must
>> dynamic
>> > create new classes for protoStuff, that caused many problems.
>> >
>> > as we discussed before, we will not dynamic create new classes, just
>> > serialize/deserialize by proto file, and proto file not support
>> > the definition of listList/listMap
>> > in this time, we must faced the compatible problem.
>> > what's the best of our choice......
>>
>
