oh. sorry, you are right

在 2019年1月25日星期五,Yang Bo <oaky...@gmail.com> 写道:

> Is vertical-count a typo? Think it should be verticle-count.
>
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 5:36 PM wjm wjm <zzz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > new change:
> >   all thread-count rename to vertical-count
> >   still allow use old key, but when use old key will print warning log,
> > notice it's ambiguous and deprecated, suggest to use new name
> >
> > 在 2019年1月24日星期四,wjm wjm <zzz...@gmail.com> 写道:
> >
> > > eventloop will not eat all cpus, OS will schedule all the threads.
> > >
> > > yhs0092 <yhs0...@163.com> 于2019年1月24日周四 上午9:49写道:
> > >
> > >> Hi, wjm. Thank you for your sharing.
> > >> As you say that if CPU count is less than 8, it's suggested that the
> > >> thread-count is set to the CPU count. There is still a doubt for me.
> In
> > the
> > >> synchronous mode, since the business logic runs in business thread
> pool,
> > >> i.e. the executor, don't we need to leave some CPU cores for the
> > business ?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Yours sincerely
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Yao Haishi
> > >> yhs0...@163.com
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 1/24/2019 09:38,bismy<bi...@qq.com> wrote:
> > >> +1
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> ------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------
> > >> 发件人: "zzzwjm"<zzz...@gmail.com>;
> > >> 发送时间: 2019年1月24日(星期四) 上午9:30
> > >> 收件人: "dev"<dev@servicecomb.apache.org>;
> > >>
> > >> 主题: [discuss] change default value of verticle instance count
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> currently, we created four type verticle for net send/receive and
> > reactive
> > >> business logic:
> > >>
> > >> - rest client verticle
> > >> - rest server verticle
> > >> - highway client verticle
> > >> - highway server verticle
> > >>
> > >> instances of them controlled by configurations:
> > >>
> > >> - servicecomb.rest.server.thread-count
> > >> - servicecomb.rest.client.thread-count
> > >> - servicecomb.highway.server.thread-count
> > >> - servicecomb. highway.client.thread-count
> > >>
> > >> default value of the configurations are set to 1 all, because
> framework
> > >> can
> > >> not know what's the best value for them, so we set the conservative
> > value
> > >>
> > >> these default values makes almost all customers need to optimize
> > >> the configuration, it's not so good.
> > >> so suggest the default values to be:
> > >>
> > >> - if cpu count less than 8, then thread-count set to cpu count
> > >> - if cpu count equals or big than 8, then thread-count set to 8
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Yang.
>

Reply via email to