Sure. Here is the JIRA issue[1]
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCB-1288 Yours sincerely Yao Haishi [email protected] 在2019年5月18日 18:57,Willem Jiang<[email protected]> 写道: Hi HaiShi, Could you create a JIRA to track this issue? Willem Jiang Twitter: willemjiang Weibo: 姜宁willem On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 5:24 PM yhs0092 <[email protected]> wrote: Hi guys. I've checked the situation described in this issue and the problem indeed exists. Maybe we can move the action of actual sending file body into org.apache.servicecomb.common.rest.AbstractRestInvocation#onExecuteHttpServerFiltersFinish, and in org.apache.servicecomb.common.rest.filter.inner.ServerRestArgsFilter#beforeSendResponseAsync the file body is only added into responseEx? Yours sincerely Yao Haishi [email protected] --------- 转发邮件信息 --------- 发件人: zhaoyan <[email protected]> 发送日期: 2019年5月8日 10:51 发送至: apache/servicecomb-java-chassis <[email protected]> 抄送人: Subscribed <[email protected]> 主题: [apache/servicecomb-java-chassis] ServerRestArgsFilter可能提前返回响应,导致后面的Filter无效 (#1201) 问题描述: org.apache.servicecomb.common.rest.filter.inner.ServerRestArgsFilter#beforeSendResponseAsync 当Object body = response.getResult();是Part类型的时候,导致响应提前返回, 从而后面的Filter滞后执行,而导致可能的错误。(比如增加Header的逻辑,就没有用了) if (Part.class.isInstance(body)) { return responseEx.sendPart((Part)body); } — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
