+1

I check done:
- Git tag and commit id OK.
- mvn clean install OK.
- hashes and signature good.

Daniel Qian <chanjars...@gmail.com> 于2019年12月11日周三 上午10:30写道:

> Every software has bugs, it's ok to release 0.2.0
>
> Bin Ma <mabin1...@gmail.com> 于2019年12月10日周二 下午9:11写道:
> >
> > The issues involve in the test code and CI, and do not affect
> > the functions of the binary and maven plugin.
> >
> > I suggest to go on to vote 0.2.0, the issues[1] can be fixed
> > in the next version.
> >
> > any thought?@PMCs
> >
> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCB-1657
> >
> > Wishes & Regards
> > -------------------------------
> > Mabin
> >
> >
> >
> > sen sun <asd992825...@gmail.com> 于2019年12月10日周二 上午11:38写道:
> >
> > > I have created the JIRA:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCB-1657
> > > Whether this issue affects the current release? Can we fix it in the
> next
> > > version?
> > >
> > > Willem Jiang <willem.ji...@gmail.com> 于2019年12月10日周二 上午10:38写道:
> > >
> > > > Please create a JIRA to check this issue.
> > > > We may consider to enable the Action in Github to running the CI with
> > > > windows.
> > > >
> > > > Willem Jiang
> > > >
> > > > Twitter: willemjiang
> > > > Weibo: 姜宁willem
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 9:46 AM sen sun <asd992825...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi, @yhs0092
> > > > >
> > > > > I have checked this unit test code.  It uses File.size to get the
> size
> > > of
> > > > > the directory.
> > > > > In Windows, it always returns zero and causes the assertion to fail
> > > > > In Linux, it is ok
> > > > > This is because their file systems are different and Files.size
> only
> > > > > guarantee the correctness of the file
> > > > >
> > > > > yhs0092 <yhs0...@163.com> 于2019年12月10日周二 上午12:16写道:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hello, I find that the `mvn clean install` build is not OK in my
> > > > > > development environment. I use a Windows computer to run it.
> > > > > > Here is the error log:
> > > > > > ```
> > > > > > [INFO] Running org.apache.servicecomb.toolkit.cli.CliTest
> > > > > > [ERROR] Tests run: 6, Failures: 2, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time
> > > elapsed:
> > > > > > 2.884 s <<< FAILURE! - in
> org.apache.servicecomb.toolkit.cli.CliTest
> > > > > > [ERROR]
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> testGenerateServiceCombCodeFromSingleContract(org.apache.servicecomb.toolkit.cli.CliTest)
> > > > > > Time elapsed: 0.834 s  <<< FAILURE!
> > > > > > java.lang.AssertionError
> > > > > >         at
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> org.apache.servicecomb.toolkit.cli.CliTest.lambda$testGenerateServiceCombCodeFromSingleContract$0(CliTest.java:54)
> > > > > >         at
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> org.apache.servicecomb.toolkit.cli.CliTest.testGenerateServiceCombCodeFromSingleContract(CliTest.java:36)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [ERROR]
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> testGenerateCodeFromMultiContract(org.apache.servicecomb.toolkit.cli.CliTest)
> > > > > > Time elapsed: 0.602 s  <<< FAILURE!
> > > > > > java.lang.AssertionError
> > > > > >         at
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> org.apache.servicecomb.toolkit.cli.CliTest.testGenerateCodeFromMultiContract(CliTest.java:89)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [INFO]
> > > > > > [INFO] Results:
> > > > > > [INFO]
> > > > > > [ERROR] Failures:
> > > > > > [ERROR]   CliTest.testGenerateCodeFromMultiContract:89
> > > > > > [ERROR]
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> CliTest.testGenerateServiceCombCodeFromSingleContract:36->lambda$testGenerateServiceCombCodeFromSingleContract$0:54
> > > > > > [INFO]
> > > > > > [ERROR] Tests run: 6, Failures: 2, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
> > > > > > ```
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yours sincerely
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yao Haishi
> > > > > > yhs0...@163.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 12/6/2019 09:09,Bin Ma<mabin1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > Hi All,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This is a call for Vote to release Apache ServiceComb Toolkit
> version
> > > > 0.2.0
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Release Candidate :
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/servicecomb/servicecomb-toolkit/0.2.0/rc-01/
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Staging Repository :
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheservicecomb-1409
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Release Tag :
> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/servicecomb-toolkit/releases/tag/0.2.0
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Release CommitID : e95ba3c7b27673ee4e360d64cc1ccce43f70f18e
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Release Notes :
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12321626&version=12346158
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Keys to verify the Release Candidate :
> > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/servicecomb/KEYS
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Voting will start now ( Friday, 6nd Dec, 2019) and will remain
> open
> > > for
> > > > > > at-least 72 hours, Request all PMC members to give their vote.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.2.0
> > > > > > [ ] +0 No Opinion
> > > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because....
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On the behalf of ServiceComb Team
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Wishes & Regards
> > > > > > -------------------------------
> > > > > > Mabin
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > >
>
>
>
> --
> Daniel Qian
> Apache Committer(chanjarster)
> blog:https://chanjarster.github.io
> github:https://github.com/chanjarster
> segmentfault: https://segmentfault.com/u/chanjarster
>

Reply via email to