Hi Guillaume I don't mind a version restart since this is a different product. BTW we should change all the command line names and env variables so that they don't conflict with servicemix 3.x
Regards, Hiram On Dec 7, 2007 9:54 AM, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In order to release something based on the ServiceMix 4 Runtime and after > having reorganized the svn repo, I will start removing snapshots wherever > possible. But i was wondering what would this release be called. > Should it be alpha, beta, milestone ? Should the version be 0.x, 1.0 or 4.0? > If we plan to somehow move this bit as a subproject which is not tied to JBI > / NMR per se, it would makes sense to restart from 1.0. > The full distribution (runtime + nmr + jbi container + camel + cxf + > activemq) could be still 4.0 I suppose. > I guess the downside if we keep 4.0 for the runtime is that we will have > different versions and that would be even more confusing imho to have a > runtime at version 4.0.1 and a jbi at version 4.1.0 bundled in a > distribution with another version number. > > So I'm thinking we could release a ServiceMix Runtime 0.1 in the coming > weeks. > Thoughts ? > > -- > Cheers, > Guillaume Nodet > ------------------------ > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > -- Regards, Hiram Blog: http://hiramchirino.com Open Source SOA http://open.iona.com
