Yep.. I was think about that but the down side would be that the
config generated would not be consistent since it depends on the stuff
in the install directory. Plus I think that eventually instance
configurations are going different than the default distribution
configuration.
On Dec 10, 2007 6:52 PM, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Great !
>
> I'm wondering if there is any way to avoid duplication of shell scripts and
> other resources.
> What about copying the resources from the ${servicemix.home} directory
> instead of embedding copies (and bring the risk to use out-of-date copies) ?
>
>
> On Dec 10, 2007 11:46 PM, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Just a heads up. I just added a create command to the smx console.
> > It will create a servicemix instance directory. The instance
> > directory is configured to have isolated config and data but shares
> > the bundles/binaries with the servicemix home directory.
> >
> > I'm hoping one day we can get to the point where the main servicemix
> > 4.0 install acts alot like a yum/fink/apt package management system
> > where an admin installs bundles into it.. and then users share that
> > install by running separate servicemix instances.
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Hiram
> >
> > Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
> >
> > Open Source SOA
> > http://open.iona.com
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
> ------------------------
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>
--
Regards,
Hiram
Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
Open Source SOA
http://open.iona.com
