On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 3:35 AM, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The standard JBI component for XSLT is servicemix-saxon:
>    http://servicemix.apache.org/servicemix-saxon.html
>  But xslt routing has not been ported to this component, though
>  a patch has recently been submitted
>  (https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1204).

OK -- though it looks like at the moment, that one performs strictly
transformations.  Whereas with the old XPath Router, you could combine
-- like transform the message once to send to endpoint A and
differently to send to endpoint B or whatever.  If you can't do it
here I guess you could use servicemix-eip to copy the message and then
use two different servicemix-saxon steps to transform the copies,
though.

>  For XPath routing, you can use the servicemix-eip content based router:
>   
> http://servicemix.apache.org/servicemix-eip.html#servicemix-eip-ContentBasedrouter

OK.  Is there generally some recommendation for when to use
servicemix-eip vs. servicemix-camel?

>  Also, you can deploy all the lightweight components inside a JBI
>  service unit by using
>  the lightweight container:
>    http://servicemix.apache.org/servicemix-lwcontainer.html

True, but my understanding is that all the lightweight components are
deprecated, so it would be better to point to the above where
possible.

Thanks,
       Aaron

>  On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 3:37 AM, Aaron Mulder
>  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > I'm stretching my understanding here, but...
>  >
>  >  Can someone update the XPath/XSLT Routing page to also show a
>  >  deployment example based on a JBI service unit (xbean.xml) as opposed
>  >  to the servicemix.xml style?
>  >
>  >  Or if the XPath/XSLT routing is a lightweight component in disguise
>  >  (for which I gather there is no xbean.xml option?), could that be
>  >  mentioned and is there any equivalent JBI component?
>  >
>  >  http://servicemix.apache.org/xpath-router.html
>  >
>  >  Thanks,
>  >        Aaron
>  >
>
>
>
>  --
>  Cheers,
>  Guillaume Nodet
>  ------------------------
>  Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>
>

Reply via email to