Re: [jira] Reopened: (SM-1225) cxf bc provider should support exchange without specifing the operationName if portType only have one operation

Freeman Fang Wed, 21 May 2008 17:03:31 -0700


Edell Nolan wrote:

Hi,


I have upgraded recently to the latest on the 3.2 branch and I am trying to
run my demo and I am now getting the following error thrown from the
CXFSEEndpoint.java - process method.

org.apache.cxf.interceptor.Fault: Operation not bound on this
MessageExchange
        at
org.apache.servicemix.cxfse.CxfSeEndpoint.process(CxfSeEndpoint.java:
204)
        at
org.apache.servicemix.common.AsyncBaseLifeCycle.doProcess(AsyncBaseLi
feCycle.java:538)

Does this mean that the OperationName will always have to be set on the
Message Exchange.

In my case I have two operations.

Yes, if you have more then one one operations, you need set theoperationName on the message exchange.

thanks, Edell.


On 5/21/08, Edell Nolan (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

    [
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel]

Edell Nolan reopened SM-1225:
-----------------------------


hi,

I have upgraded recently to a later snapshot and I am not getting the
following error in my demo

Using orderId [52]INFO  - OrderProcessor                 - Received
exchange: In
Only[
id: ID:10.5.2.186-11a0be12826-6:1
status: Active
role: provider
endpoint: orderProcessor
in: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><order-id>52</order-id>
]
1975788  order-processor  TRACE  [pool-flow.seda.servicemix-bean-thread-3]
openj
pa.jdbc.SQL - <t 3927410, conn 23659716> executing prepstmnt 12155830
SELECT t0.
statusId, t0.comments, t1.ORDER_ID, t1.customerId, t1.customerPoNumber,
t1.order
Date, t2.statusId, t2.comments, t2.ORDER_ID, t2.statusCode, t0.statusCode
FROM O
rderStatus t0 LEFT OUTER JOIN Ord t1 ON t0.ORDER_ID = t1.ORDER_ID LEFT
OUTER JOI
N OrderStatus t2 ON t1.orderStatus_statusId = t2.statusId WHERE
(t0.ORDER_ID = ?
) [params=(long) 52]
1975788  order-processor  TRACE  [pool-flow.seda.servicemix-bean-thread-3]
openj
pa.jdbc.SQL - <t 3927410, conn 23659716> [0 ms] spent
1975788  order-processor  TRACE  [pool-flow.seda.servicemix-bean-thread-3]
openj
pa.jdbc.SQL - <t 3927410, conn 13619513> executing prepstmnt 19827612
UPDATE Ord
erStatus SET comments = ?, statusCode = ?, ORDER_ID = ? WHERE statusId = ?
[para
ms=(String) Thank you for your order!  Your order# is 52, (short) 0, (long)
52,
(long) 102]
1975788  order-processor  TRACE  [pool-flow.seda.servicemix-bean-thread-3]
openj
pa.jdbc.SQL - <t 3927410, conn 13619513> [0 ms] spent
1975788  order-processor  TRACE  [pool-flow.seda.servicemix-bean-thread-3]
openj
pa.jdbc.SQL - <t 3927410, conn 13619513> executing prepstmnt 27111789
UPDATE Ord
SET customerId = ? WHERE ORDER_ID = ? [params=(long) 12345, (long) 51]
1975788  order-processor  TRACE  [pool-flow.seda.servicemix-bean-thread-3]
openj
pa.jdbc.SQL - <t 3927410, conn 13619513> [0 ms] spent
1975788  order-processor  TRACE  [pool-flow.seda.servicemix-bean-thread-3]
openj
pa.jdbc.SQL - <t 3927410, conn 13619513> executing prepstmnt 32098716
UPDATE Ord
erStatus SET statusCode = ? WHERE statusId = ? [params=(short) 1, (long)
101]
1975788  order-processor  TRACE  [pool-flow.seda.servicemix-bean-thread-3]
openj
pa.jdbc.SQL - <t 3927410, conn 13619513> [0 ms] spent
1975804  order-processor  TRACE  [pool-flow.seda.servicemix-bean-thread-3]
openj
pa.jdbc.SQL - <t 3927410, conn 13619513> executing prepstmnt 11029186
UPDATE Ord
SET customerId = ?, customerPoNumber = ?, orderDate = ?,
orderStatus_statusId =
? WHERE ORDER_ID = ? [params=(long) 12345, (String) 6666, (null) null,
(null) n
ull, (long) 52]
1975804  order-processor  TRACE  [pool-flow.seda.servicemix-bean-thread-3]
openj
pa.jdbc.SQL - <t 3927410, conn 13619513> [0 ms] spent
1975897  order-processor  TRACE  [pool-flow.seda.servicemix-bean-thread-3]
openj
pa.jdbc.SQL - <t 3927410, conn 21056658> executing prepstmnt 14194056
SELECT t0.
statusId, t0.comments, t1.ORDER_ID, t1.customerId, t1.customerPoNumber,
t1.order
Date, t2.statusId, t2.comments, t2.ORDER_ID, t2.statusCode, t0.statusCode
FROM O
rderStatus t0 LEFT OUTER JOIN Ord t1 ON t0.ORDER_ID = t1.ORDER_ID LEFT
OUTER JOI
N OrderStatus t2 ON t1.orderStatus_statusId = t2.statusId WHERE
(t0.ORDER_ID = ?
) [params=(long) 52]
1975897  order-processor  TRACE  [pool-flow.seda.servicemix-bean-thread-3]
openj
pa.jdbc.SQL - <t 3927410, conn 21056658> [0 ms] spent
1975897  order-processor  TRACE  [pool-flow.seda.servicemix-bean-thread-3]
openj
pa.jdbc.SQL - <t 3927410, conn 24726433> executing prepstmnt 6867282 UPDATE
Orde
rStatus SET statusCode = ? WHERE statusId = ? [params=(short) 1, (long)
102]
1975897  order-processor  TRACE  [pool-flow.seda.servicemix-bean-thread-3]
openj
pa.jdbc.SQL - <t 3927410, conn 24726433> [0 ms] spent
1975897  order-processor  TRACE  [pool-flow.seda.servicemix-bean-thread-3]
openj
pa.jdbc.SQL - <t 3927410, conn 24726433> executing prepstmnt 18081991
UPDATE Ord
SET customerId = ? WHERE ORDER_ID = ? [params=(long) 12345, (long) 51]
1975897  order-processor  TRACE  [pool-flow.seda.servicemix-bean-thread-3]
openj
pa.jdbc.SQL - <t 3927410, conn 24726433> [0 ms] spent
1975897  order-processor  TRACE  [pool-flow.seda.servicemix-bean-thread-3]
openj
pa.jdbc.SQL - <t 3927410, conn 24726433> executing prepstmnt 14682501
UPDATE Ord
erStatus SET statusCode = ? WHERE statusId = ? [params=(short) 1, (long)
101]
1975897  order-processor  TRACE  [pool-flow.seda.servicemix-bean-thread-3]
openj
pa.jdbc.SQL - <t 3927410, conn 24726433> [0 ms] spent
1975897  order-processor  TRACE  [pool-flow.seda.servicemix-bean-thread-3]
openj
pa.jdbc.SQL - <t 3927410, conn 24726433> executing prepstmnt 30653307
UPDATE Ord
SET customerId = ? WHERE ORDER_ID = ? [params=(long) 12345, (long) 52]
1975897  order-processor  TRACE  [pool-flow.seda.servicemix-bean-thread-3]
openj
pa.jdbc.SQL - <t 3927410, conn 24726433> [0 ms] spent
ERROR - CxfSeComponent                 - Error processing exchange InOnly[
id: ID:10.5.2.186-11a0be12826-6:1
status: Done
role: consumer
endpoint: orderProcessor
in: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><order-id>52</order-id>
]
org.apache.cxf.interceptor.Fault: Operation not bound on this
MessageExchange
       at
org.apache.servicemix.cxfse.CxfSeEndpoint.process(CxfSeEndpoint.java:
204)
       at
org.apache.servicemix.common.AsyncBaseLifeCycle.doProcess(AsyncBaseLi
feCycle.java:538)
       at
org.apache.servicemix.common.AsyncBaseLifeCycle.processExchange(Async
BaseLifeCycle.java:512)
       at
org.apache.servicemix.common.BaseLifeCycle.onMessageExchange(BaseLife
Cycle.java:46)
       at
org.apache.servicemix.jbi.messaging.DeliveryChannelImpl.processInBoun
d(DeliveryChannelImpl.java:610)
       at
org.apache.servicemix.jbi.nmr.flow.AbstractFlow.doRouting(AbstractFlo
w.java:172)
       at
org.apache.servicemix.jbi.nmr.flow.seda.SedaFlow.doRouting(SedaFlow.j
ava:167)
       at
org.apache.servicemix.jbi.nmr.flow.seda.SedaQueue$1.run(SedaQueue.jav
a:134)
       at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExec
utor.java:650)
       at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor
.java:675)
       at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)
Caused by: java.lang.Exception: Operation not bound on this MessageExchange
       ... 11 more
ERROR - CxfSeComponent                 - Error setting exchange status to
ERROR
javax.jbi.messaging.MessagingException: illegal call to send / sendSync
       at
org.apache.servicemix.jbi.messaging.MessageExchangeImpl.handleSend(Me
ssageExchangeImpl.java:614)
       at
org.apache.servicemix.jbi.messaging.DeliveryChannelImpl.doSend(Delive
ryChannelImpl.java:385)
       at
org.apache.servicemix.jbi.messaging.DeliveryChannelImpl.send(Delivery
ChannelImpl.java:431)
       at
org.apache.servicemix.common.BaseLifeCycle.onMessageExchange(BaseLife
Cycle.java:58)
       at
org.apache.servicemix.jbi.messaging.DeliveryChannelImpl.processInBoun
d(DeliveryChannelImpl.java:610)
       at
org.apache.servicemix.jbi.nmr.flow.AbstractFlow.doRouting(AbstractFlo
w.java:172)
       at
org.apache.servicemix.jbi.nmr.flow.seda.SedaFlow.doRouting(SedaFlow.j
ava:167)
       at
org.apache.servicemix.jbi.nmr.flow.seda.SedaQueue$1.run(SedaQueue.jav
a:134)
       at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExec
utor.java:650)
       at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor
.java:675)
       at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)
21-May-2008 16:05:20 org.apache.cxf.transport.jbi.JBITransportFactory
setDeliver
yChannel
INFO: configuring
DeliveryChannel:      org.apache.servicemix.common.EndpointDel
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Freeman - are you expecting that there will always be an operationName set
in the Exchange.

My demo was working before I upgraded. My PortType has two operations in
it.

thanks, Edell.

cxf bc provider should support exchange without specifing the

operationName if portType only have one operation

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                Key: SM-1225
                URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1225
            Project: ServiceMix
         Issue Type: Bug
         Components: servicemix-cxf-bc
           Reporter: Freeman Fang
           Assignee: Freeman Fang
            Fix For: 3.2.2, 3.3

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Re: [jira] Reopened: (SM-1225) cxf bc provider should support exchange without specifing the operationName if portType only have one operation

Reply via email to