[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Guillaume Nodet resolved SM-1363.
---------------------------------
Assignee: Guillaume Nodet
Fix Version/s: 3.3
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks a lot for this patch Dave !
Sending
distributions/apache-servicemix/src/main/release/conf/activemq.xml
Sending distributions/apache-servicemix/src/main/release/conf/jndi.xml
Sending pom.xml
Transmitting file data ...
Committed revision 663510.
> Update the default persistence adapter from journaledJDBC to
> amqPersistenceAdapter
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SM-1363
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1363
> Project: ServiceMix
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 3.3
> Environment: Servicemix 3.3
> Reporter: Dave Stanley
> Assignee: Guillaume Nodet
> Fix For: 3.3
>
> Attachments: patch.diff
>
>
> ActiveMQ 5.x introduced a new high performance persistence adapter ([AMQ
> Message Store|http://activemq.apache.org/amq-message-store.html]).
> In my tests here I am seeing a decent performance boost for a relatively easy
> configuration change:
> JournaledJDBC:
> [java] Overall time: 137701 ms
> [java] Messages per sec: 7.262111386264443
> [java]
> [java] Time: 139.603
> [java]
> [java] OK (1 test)
>
> AMQ Message Store:
> [java] Overall time: 20511 ms
> [java] Messages per sec: 48.75432694651651
> [java]
> [java] Time: 23.556
> [java]
> [java] OK (1 test)
> I think it would be worthwhile making the default persistence adapter the
> amqPersistenceAdapter vs the current journaledJDBC.
> I've attached a patch, *but* note it requires an ActiveMQ upgrade from 4.1.1
> to 5.1.0. and as the namespaces have changed in ActiveMQ 5.1 I had to update
> the ra namespace in jndi.xml also.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
