Awesome thx.

On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 9:09 AM, Gert Vanthienen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hiram,
>
> Good question!  Up to now, there was no difference.  This property is used
> to generate the additional entries in spring.schemas.  E.g. for the 3.2.1
> release of container/components
> http://servicemix.apache.org/schema/servicemix-http-3.2.1.xsd=servicemix-http.xsd
>
> I guess we will need this property in every single component pom.xml after a
> while, with the previous releases of that single component.   I had already
> added it to the component's root pom.xml, but I'll move it to both
> components' pom.xml files.  For the container, we will also need this
> property to keep track of container releases -- but there we can keep it a
> single property for the entire container project.
>
> Gert
>
> Hiram Chirino wrote:
>>
>> so, should the previous.releases be set to the previous releases of
>> the components or the previous releases of the container?
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 3:23 AM, Gert Vanthienen
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> L.S.,
>>>
>>>
>>> Just two questions/remarks:
>>> - We still need to add the previous.releases somewhere to get the
>>> spring.schemas files to contain the necessary entries for earlier
>>> releases
>>> as well.  I would propose to add it to the components root pom.xml, but
>>> we
>>> would have to keep the same property in the root  pom.xml for the
>>> ServiceMix
>>> 3 container as well (for the core and audit xsd files). - Does it make
>>> sense
>>> to add the archetypes to this components hierarchy?  Wouldn't it be
>>> better
>>> to add them to a separate tooling/archetypes project and release all
>>> archetypes in a single release but separately from their components?
>>>  They
>>> probably won't need to change as much as their components and we also
>>> have a
>>> few archetypes that do not match any component (servicemix-project-root,
>>> servicemix-binding-component, ...)
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Gert
>>>
>>> Hiram Chirino wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>
>>>> if you get a chance please review the 2 components ported over to the
>>>> new per component release structure.
>>>>
>>>> Just checkout:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/components/components-pom/trunk/
>>>>
>>>> I'm happy with it.  And I'm eager to do the same for the rest of the
>>>> components in the smx3 trunk branch.  Please let me know if I should
>>>> hold of in doing the rest of the components.
>>>>
>>>> Should we do a release of the 2 that have been ported to test the
>>>> release process?
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Hiram
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>



-- 
Regards,
Hiram

Blog: http://hiramchirino.com

Open Source SOA
http://open.iona.com

Reply via email to