[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SMX4-10?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=45511#action_45511
]
Ron Gavlin commented on SMX4-10:
--------------------------------
I see that SMX4 currently provides native support for camel. How does that
compare with the stateless, async api integration proposed in this JIRA?
> Investigate camel / servicemix integration
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SMX4-10
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SMX4-10
> Project: ServiceMix 4
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Guillaume Nodet
> Assignee: Santosh R Dubey
>
> Currently camel and servicemix works mainly side by side.
> The main value added of Camel is the DSL, so I'm wondering if it would be
> possible / worthwhile to rebuild the camel dsl on top of a stateless
> asynchronous api like servicemix one. This would enable a complete
> integration by not only sharing the exchange model, but also the endpoints
> and components.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
