Hello gnodet,
do you have any sample code or link about explaining this concept. How
do we say in component c that the transaction is started by A and which
component does the rollback?.. A sample code will really help me out to
understand better.
gnodet wrote:
>
> Why would you need subtransactions for that, you just need a single
> transaction and if any error occurs, the whole transaction will be
> rolled back.
>
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 8:29 AM, smx_user <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Can anyone let me know is there support of Nested or sub
>> transaction in servicemix. What iam looking for if a msg is exchanged
>> between A->B->C , the flow between A->C is the main transaction and the
>> flow
>> between B->C is the subtransction. So if exchange between B->C fails then
>> the flow between A->B is considered as a failure and it should be rolled
>> back.
>>
>> Information about any third party component which can be deployed in
>> servicemix to handle the nexted/sub transaction is also welcome.
>>
>> looking for reply
>>
>> Thanks and Regards
>> Param
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/Nested-Sub-Transaction-in-service-Mix-tp20027776p20027776.html
>> Sent from the ServiceMix - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
> ------------------------
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> ------------------------
> Open Source SOA
> http://fusesource.com
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Nested-Sub-Transaction-in-service-Mix-tp20027776p20030141.html
Sent from the ServiceMix - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
