Maybe we only selectively replace errors with faults. In this particular case, would it be reasonable to represent a in-out provider "timeout" as a fault? Then, unless a robust-in-only mep is used, this fault normally gets converted into an error anyway.
/Ron gnodet wrote: > > I think I understand your point of view, but I'm not sure if it would > be a good idea to swallow all errors and replace them by faults. > Could that be done using a specific marshaler ? > > On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 13:24, rgavlin <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I have a flow jms:consumer -> camel:errorHandler ->(robust-in-only)-> >> eip:pipeline(jms:provider transformer) -> file:sender. >> >> When the in-out jms:provider times out, it returns a JBI Error with an >> IllegalStateException. This is a "somewhat" expected condition in our >> environment which we catch and retry with an smx-camel errorHandler. We >> would like the smx-jms:provider to return a JBI Fault instead of an Error >> in >> this circumstance so that the SMX Log remains clean and only includes >> Errors >> when true Error Conditions occur. If we are successful on say a third >> errorhandler-initiated retry, we don't want errors appearing in the logs >> for >> the first two unsuccessful attempts. >> >> Does it make sense to have JBI Faults represent retryable "checked >> exceptions" and Errors represent more non-retryable "runtime exceptions". >> In >> this case, JBI Faults would only appear as Errors in the SMX logs if >> "in-only" rather than "robust-in-only" MEPs were used. Does that make >> sense? >> Do you have any thoughts? >> >> /Ron >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/JMS-in-out-provider-timeout---fault-vs.-error-tp21871482p21871482.html >> Sent from the ServiceMix - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> > > > > -- > Cheers, > Guillaume Nodet > ------------------------ > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > ------------------------ > Open Source SOA > http://fusesource.com > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/JMS-in-out-provider-timeout---fault-vs.-error-tp21871482p21919639.html Sent from the ServiceMix - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
