>From my point of view, I think that a minimal JBI container is a good way.
We can have : - SMX kernel - SMX JBI container including the kernel - SMX4 including the JBI container, activemq, components, etc Regards JB On Thursday 12 February 2009 - 10:19, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > Currently the NMR assembly consists of all artifacts , but it's not > really useful on its own. > Should we modify that one to include the JBI ant tasks and the kernel > so that we would have a minimal JBI container ? > The difference with the full smx4 release would be that activemq, > transactions and jbi components would not be deployed directly. > Thoughts ? > > -- > Cheers, > Guillaume Nodet > ------------------------ > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > ------------------------ > Open Source SOA > http://fusesource.com
