I think that having one Jira for all components (to begin) is more applicable right now.
Especially, it will be easier for the users to target the JIRA with component in general, whereas sometime it can be difficult to identify the exact component involved. Regards JB On Thursday 12 February 2009 - 20:06, Lars Heinemann wrote: > Well...this is not easy to decide. > I would prefer the JIRA per component solution but I also see a big > overhead here and maybe > it's not worth the time doing this if only 1-2 releases are done per > component and year. > > So I would suggest starting with the single Jira for all components > solution at the moment. > > What do the others think? > > Regards > Lars > > > Gert Vanthienen schrieb: > > L.S., > > > > If we look at the ServiceMix 3 JIRA project, the list of releases in > > there is getting very long and very hard to work with. I know we > > discussed this before, but I really think it makes sense to make a > > separate JIRA project or projects for the components now. > > One solution would be to create a single JIRA project for all the > > components. Because we can release components independently, the > > version numbers on the components will be going out of sync. One way > > to handle this, is by using the same versioning scheme as we are using > > now in SMX3, e.g. servicemix-ftp-2008.01 for version 2008.01 of > > servicemix-ftp. On the other hand, we could also just create plain > > version numbers like 2009.01 and then keeping the release open in JIRA > > until all components have reached that version. > > > > The other way to get passed this would be to create a JIRA project per > > component. This way, we could use versions in JIRA just as we are > > used to, but the overhead of setting this up would be quite big. > > > > Which solution would people prefer? Are there any other suggestions > > for solving this? > > > > Regards, > > > > Gert > > > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré (Nanthrax) BuildProcess/AutoDeploy Project Leader http://buildprocess.sourceforge.net [email protected] PGP : 17D4F086
