I don't think it's not interesting.
I think the easiest path would be to provide a few shell scripts that
just call the ant tasks.
Maybe even a single shell script with arguments would be fine.
In addition a shutdown command would be a handy addition to that script imho ...

On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 11:09,  <[email protected]> wrote:
> Guys,
>
> If you think that the shell tool is not interesting, don't hesitate to slap 
> me :)
> Maybe, I have forgotten that another set of tools already exist to do the 
> same.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On Friday 20 February 2009 - 10:00, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>> What about the ant tasks ? You can list all JBI artifacts, change
>> their lifecycle etc...
>> How would your scripts connect to Smx to do things ?
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 09:37,  <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > The problem is that the customer want to "script" some actions using sh 
>> > and so the console can't be used.
>> >
>> > More over, the console is not always installed on a "production" 
>> > environment and I think that the console can't create a SU from a 
>> > xbean.xml.
>> >
>> > I can extend the console feature and use the same "classes" in the 
>> > "script" tool.
>> >
>> > Regards
>> > JB
>> >
>> > On Friday 20 February 2009 - 09:19, Lars Heinemann wrote:
>> >> Hi JB,
>> >>
>> >> what would be the benefit of this? Most of the listed things can be
>> >> achieved by using the JConsole.
>> >>
>> >> Regards,
>> >> Lars
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> 2009/2/20  <[email protected]>:
>> >> > Hi guys,
>> >> >
>> >> > I'm coming back from three days with a customer where I have installed 
>> >> > SMX 3.3 on AIX6/Power6/JVM IBM 1.5.
>> >> > I have deployed a set of services using CXF-SE using EJBs in WebSphere 
>> >> > 6.1.0.17.
>> >> >
>> >> > Basicly, the customer has asked how to view the SU/SA deployed (without 
>> >> > the console, directly in command line) and
>> >> > if it's a tool is provided to add a SU BC in front of an existing SE.
>> >> >
>> >> > Resulting with this dealing, I propose to add a tool in SMX 3.3 which 
>> >> > is a kind of mix between SMX4 gshell and SMX3 console.
>> >> >
>> >> > I have wrote a kind of feature scope in the plane yesterday evening and 
>> >> > I propose :
>> >> > - to add a script bin/smx-shell (like we have bin/servicemix)
>> >> > - the smx-shell can : list the SAs, list the SUs, stop/start SA/SU, 
>> >> > create a SU zip using a xbean.xml and a set of jar (like the maven 
>> >> > plugin does but without any requirement to have maven already 
>> >> > installed, the purpose is to be able to add for example a JMS SU that 
>> >> > target a SE), test a SA (providing a typed normalized message content)
>> >> >
>> >> > What do you think of that ?
>> >> > Could I create smx3-shell project in the tooling svn directory ?
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks,
>> >> > Regards
>> >> > JB
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> http://lhein.blogspot.com
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>> Guillaume Nodet
>> ------------------------
>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>> ------------------------
>> Open Source SOA
>> http://fusesource.com
>



-- 
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com

Reply via email to