Hi,
I think it should OK with IBM JRE, since the Sun's JavaMail bundle only
dependents on activation.jar.
BTW, IBM's WebSphere also uses the Sun's JavaMail.
Willem
Lars Heinemann wrote:
We once used Sun's JavaMail API. It was switched to Geronimo for some
reason. Are there maybe problems
when using a IBM JRE? I would also prefer Sun JavaMail as it is far better.
Lars
2009/8/12 Chris Custine <[email protected]>:
I am not opposed to it, but I wonder if anyone had a reason for using the
Geronimo version instead. It looks like the license is OK for an Apache
project so unless I am missing something, it sounds good to me.
Chris
--
Chris Custine
FUSESource :: http://fusesource.com
My Blog :: http://blog.organicelement.com
Apache ServiceMix :: http://servicemix.apache.org
Apache Directory Server :: http://directory.apache.org
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Willem Jiang <[email protected]>wrote:
Hi,
Recently we got lots of user complains about using camel-mail in
servicemix[1][2][3].
Since the sun's java mail more stable and more wildly used, a better
solution is to use the sun java mail bundle instead of the geronimo one.
I found Spring bundle repository provides the mail[3] and the activation[4]
bundle.
Can Servicemix switch to ship java mail ri bundle?
[1]http://fusesource.com/issues/browse/ESB-681
[2]http://fusesource.com/issues/browse/ESB-682
[3]http://fusesource.com/issues/browse/MR-173
[4]http://www.springsource.com/repository/app/search?query=mail
[5]http://www.springsource.com/repository/app/search?query=activation
Willem
