I don't think Abdera HAS a release life cycle.   They've been trying to get 
1.0 out for well over a year now.    That's why we're stuck on 0.4.0.

Dan


On Wed September 2 2009 9:24:36 am Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> After dealing with Dan on IRC, CXF requires the following bundles:
>
> org.apache.abdera:abdera-core:0.4.0-incubating
> org.apache.abdera:abdera-i18n:0.4.0-incubating
> org.apache.abdera:abdera-parser:0.4.0-incubating
> org.apache.abdera:abdera-extensions-json:0.4.0-incubating
> org.apache.abdera:abdera-extensions-main:0.4.0-incubating
>
> Currently, only abdera-core is provided.
>
> I have two ways to do it:
> 1/ create only abdera bundle gathering all abdera components
> 2/ create one bundle per abdera part.
>
>  From my point of view, I prefer 2 especially if the life cycle of
> abdera components is different (if the extensions version goes faster
> than the core part for example).
>
> What's your opinion ?
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> > Are they packaged in a way that turning them into OSGi bundles is even
> > possible ?
> > I'm mostly thinking about split packages: if the same package is provided
> > by two different jars (each one contributing a few classes to the
> > package), it won't work in OSGi and we'd have to turn them into a single
> > bundle.
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 11:34, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> 
wrote:
> >> Hi again,
> >>
> >> I'm working on SMXCOMP-611 to provide bundles required by CXF.
> >>
> >> I have question regarding abdera bundle.
> >>
> >> Currently, we have an abdera-0.4.0-incubating bundle linked to the
> >> abdera-core dependency.
> >>
> >> CXF required other abdera dependency.
> >>
> >> I propose to create the following new bundles:
> >> - abdera-core-1.0
> >> - abdera-client-1.0
> >> - abdera-i18n-1.0
> >> - abdera-parser-1.0
> >> - abdera-spring-1.0
> >> - abdera-extensions-geo-1.0
> >> - abdera-extensions-html-1.0
> >> - abdera-extensions-json-1.0
> >> - abdera-extensions-main-1.0
> >>
> >> Does it make sense for you ?
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Regards
> >> JB

-- 
Daniel Kulp
[email protected]
http://www.dankulp.com/blog

Reply via email to