+1

Jamie

On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks for the review Jamie.
>
> I have corrected just right now.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> Jamie G. wrote:
>>
>> All in all a very nice job on the release-guide wiki :)
>>
>> Two very brief comments:
>>
>> 1) In the "Staging the Release Candidate" section the enumeration
>> needs to be corrected (very minor issue).
>>
>> 2) Under "Wait for the Results" the part about "I will copy this
>> release to the Felix dist directory", are there any more instructions
>> regarding this? I would think that we would be copying into our own
>> distribution directory.
>>
>> Jamie
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Lars Heinemann<[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I only upgraded components pom to use the version 3 of the
>>> servicemix-pom containing the nexus repos.
>>>
>>> Lars
>>>
>>>
>>> 2009/9/8 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>:
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Lars has upgraded servicemix parent pom to version 3 to use the Apache
>>>> Nexus
>>>> repository.
>>>>
>>>> I propose to release a version 4 of the ServiceMix Component POM (and
>>>> upgrade to version 5-SNAPSHOT) to be able to release new components.
>>>>
>>>> This release includes:
>>>> - usage of servicemix-pom 3
>>>> - usage of servicemix-utils 1.2.0
>>>>
>>>> Staging repository:
>>>>
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/servicemix-staging-047/
>>>>
>>>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>>>
>>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>>>> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>>>>
>>>> This vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>>>
>>>> PS: with the help of Gert, I have updated the release-guide wiki and I
>>>> used
>>>> it for this release to be sure it's correct:
>>>> http://servicemix.apache.org/release-guide.html
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Regards
>>>> JB
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> http://lhein.blogspot.com
>>>
>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré (Nanthrax)
> BuildProcess/AutoDeploy Project Leader
> http://buildprocess.sourceforge.net
> [email protected]
> PGP : 17D4F086
>

Reply via email to