This is a question that I have already debate with Guillaume in the past. If I remember that was concerning the bundles created for servicemix project (I mean SMX4 - Apache SM4 which is now Apache Felix Karaf).
My suggestion is to have something like : Fusesource could be the right place for that --> http://fusesource/repository/bundles If fusesource can handle code source with different licensing mode. That would be great. Charles Moulliard Senior Enterprise Architect Apache Camel Committer ***************************** blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Gert Vanthienen <[email protected] > wrote: > L.S., > > Last night, I was looking for a bundle for Sun's JNA and I created a > pom.xml for generating it in our own bundles project. However, we can > not release this at Apache because JNA is LGPL-licensed. > > This raises the question if our Apache project is the ideal place for > creating and releasing those bundles. Most of the things we use have > an Apache-compatible license, but for the other stuff we would need to > look for another location. Wouldn't it be a better idea to move all > of the bundles to another location instead of having things at two > distinct locations? Any suggestions on where to move things? > > On the other hand, the SpringSource folks already have a large set of > bundles that are publicly available at > http://www.springsource.com/repository/app/. Do we want to > build/maintain our own bundles next to those available or should we > just use what's available out there? > > Thoughts? > > Gert Vanthienen > ------------------------ > Open Source SOA: http://fusesource.com > Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/ >
