I think the problem comes from the fact that the spring jmx assembler
not being set up.

On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 16:00, Eoghan Glynn <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On a side note, I'm seing a lot of those exceptions in the log:
>> Caused by: javax.management. NotCompliantMBeanException:
>> ...
>> Not sure exactly where they come from, but we need to fix those.
>
> I'm on this NotCompliantMBeanException issue, should have a fix shortly
> (tracked via SMX4NMR-165).
>
> Cheers,
> Eoghan
>
>
> 2009/10/14 Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]>
>
>> On a side note, I'm seing a lot of those exceptions in the log:
>>
>> Caused by: javax.management.NotCompliantMBeanException: MBean class
>> org.apache.servicemix.nmr.management.ManagedEndpoint does not
>> implement DynamicMBean, neither follows the Standard MBean conventions
>> (javax.management.NotCompliantMBeanException: Class
>> org.apache.servicemix.nmr.management.ManagedEndpoint is not a JMX
>> compliant Standard MBean) nor the MXBean conventions
>> (javax.management.NotCompliantMBeanException:
>> org.apache.servicemix.nmr.management.ManagedEndpoint: Class
>> org.apache.servicemix.nmr.management.ManagedEndpoint is not a JMX
>> compliant MXBean)
>>
>> Not sure exactly where they come from, but we need to fix those.
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 10:02, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > FWIW, I've slightly changed the startup mechanism for smx4 so that all
>> > the bundles are resolved as completely as possible (i.e. not having
>> > optional imports that could be solved, but aren't due to bundles start
>> > up order).
>> >
>> > To avoid a bad interaction between fileinstall and the features
>> > service around the deployment of the activemq-broker.xml, i've moved
>> > the broker config into the etc/ folder and use a feature with the
>> > spring url handler to deploy this one.  This way, fileinstall does not
>> > try to deploy the activemq-broker.xml, but it's taken in charge by the
>> > boot features mechanism.  The problem was that fileinstall was trying
>> > to start the generated activemq-broker bundle, thus forcing the
>> > resolution of bundles before it was actually necessary and was causing
>> > problems with unresolved optional imports.   The downside is that you
>> > can't change the etc/activemq-broker.xml and expect it to be
>> > redeployed automatically.  Instead, you'll have to osgi:refresh the
>> > bunde after any change, but I don't think it's a big drawback.
>> > This change also seem to have had a good impact on startup time, but
>> > I'll dig a bit more into that, as my cpu consumption is not very high,
>> > so I think we can still improve things here.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Cheers,
>> > Guillaume Nodet
>> > ------------------------
>> > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>> > ------------------------
>> > Open Source SOA
>> > http://fusesource.com
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>> Guillaume Nodet
>> ------------------------
>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>> ------------------------
>> Open Source SOA
>> http://fusesource.com
>>
>



-- 
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com

Reply via email to