L.S., Sounds like a good plan to me
Regards, Gert Vanthienen ------------------------ Open Source SOA: http://fusesource.com Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/ 2010/1/22 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>: > Hi Chris, > > +1 to go directly to NMR 1.2 and SMX 4.2. > > If all are OK, I will upgrade the POM in this way during the week end. > > Regards > JB > > Chris Custine wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> In preparation for releasing the next ServiceMix 4, I would like to >> propose >> that we skip a minor version number and release as NMR 1.2 and ServiceMix >> 4.2. There are a couple of reasons for this. First, we have a few of our >> own bundles in both NMR and the Features projects that will actually be >> numbered the same as the release. As we know, this can cause problems for >> some people using SNAPSHOTs because the SNAPSHOT version will actually be >> considered as newer than the release due to OSGi versioning semantics. >> Second, this is going to be made worse by some of the open source users >> that are mixing in parts from the FUSE distribution which is already at >> 4.1. >> >> I think we can debate the long term versioning strategy separately (Apache >> Felix bundles use odd numbers for SNAPSHOTs and only release even >> numbers), >> but for the time being I wanted to see if anyone would object to releasing >> as NMR 1.2.0 and ServiceMix 4.2.0 to clear up some of these issues? >> >> Thanks, >> Chris >> >> -- >> Chris Custine >> FUSESource :: http://fusesource.com >> My Blog :: http://blog.organicelement.com >> Apache ServiceMix :: http://servicemix.apache.org >> Apache Felix :: http://felix.apache.org >> Apache Directory Server :: http://directory.apache.org >> >
