I can take a look as well, I think it may be simply a matter of re-arranging the lifecycle of the plugins a little. I'll give it a shot right now. -- Chris Custine FUSESource :: http://fusesource.com My Blog :: http://blog.organicelement.com Apache ServiceMix :: http://servicemix.apache.org Apache Felix :: http://felix.apache.org Apache Directory Server :: http://directory.apache.org
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi Chris, > > I'm agree to resubmit a new release to vote but I need help concerning the > JBoss sar. I checked it, the sar is constructed in package phase but before > signing. > > I will take a new look tonight. > > Regards > JB > > > Chris Custine wrote: > >> I'm checking this release out now, but it looks like the sha1 and md5 are >> not matching the JBoss SAR. I think this is similar to the issue we had >> with the last components release. Just like the last time, the problem is >> that maven will complain about the signatures if anyone uses Maven to >> download it (I know we have several users deploying the SAR in JBoss). >> >> I hate to say this, but I am thinking we will need to fix the build >> lifecycle issue so that the SAR gets a proper signature before the deploy >> and cut a new release. >> >> WDYT? >> >> Chris >> -- >> Chris Custine >> FUSESource :: http://fusesource.com >> My Blog :: http://blog.organicelement.com >> Apache ServiceMix :: http://servicemix.apache.org >> Apache Felix :: http://felix.apache.org >> Apache Directory Server :: http://directory.apache.org >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 7:57 AM, Charles Moulliard <[email protected] >> >wrote: >> >> +1 >>> >>> >>> Charles Moulliard >>> >>> Senior Enterprise Architect (J2EE, .NET, SOA) >>> Apache Camel Committer >>> >>> ******************************************************************* >>> - Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >>> - Twitter : http://twitter.com/cmoulliard >>> - Linkedlin : http://www.linkedin.com/in/charlesmoulliard >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected] >>> >>>> wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> We solved 29 issues in this release: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/activemq/sr/jira.issueviews:searchrequest-printable/temp/SearchRequest.html?pid=10950&fixfor=12152&status=5&status=6&sorter/field=priority&sorter/order=DESC&tempMax=1000 >>> >>>> There are still 7 outstanding issues: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/activemq/sr/jira.issueviews:searchrequest-printable/temp/SearchRequest.html?pid=10950&fixfor=12152&status=1&status=3&status=4&sorter/field=priority&sorter/order=DESC&tempMax=1000 >>> >>>> that will be postponed to ServiceMix 3.3.3 release. >>>> >>>> Staging repository: >>>> >>>> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheservicemix-021/ >>> >>>> Please vote to approve this release: >>>> >>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release >>>> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments) >>>> >>>> This vote will be open for 72 hours. >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> Regards >>>> JB >>>> >>>> >>
