+1, I agree getting 4.2 out is more important right now. Jamie
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 8:27 AM, Freeman Fang <[email protected]> wrote: > Yeah, +1 for it. > > Freeman > On 2010-4-18, at 下午6:14, Gert Vanthienen wrote: > >> L.S., >> >> Sound like a good idea to me -- let's get ServiceMix 4.2 out without >> any additional delays. >> >> Regards, >> >> Gert Vanthienen >> ------------------------ >> Open Source SOA: http://fusesource.com >> Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/ >> >> >> >> On 18 April 2010 10:26, Chris Custine <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> I have all tests passing on SMX 4.2 and related projects now and I was >>> going >>> to do the release build today. Could we live without this upgrade to >>> Lucene >>> 3.0.1 for 4.2 and add it back in later this week after the release? >>> After >>> pushing through this weekend getting 4.2 ready for release I would rather >>> not wait 3 days for this bundle if possible. >>> >>> Chris >>> -- >>> Chris Custine >>> FUSESource :: http://fusesource.com >>> My Blog :: http://blog.organicelement.com >>> Apache ServiceMix :: http://servicemix.apache.org >>> Apache Felix :: http://felix.apache.org >>> Apache Directory Server :: http://directory.apache.org >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 1:02 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> Subject: [VOTE] Release ServiceMix [Component] XXX version Y.Z >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Now NMR audit uses ServiceMix Lucene 3.0.1 bundle. In preparation of the >>>> next NMR release, I submit ServiceMix Lucene 3.0.1_1 bundle to vote. >>>> >>>> Staging repository: >>>> >>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheservicemix-039/ >>>> >>>> Please vote to approve this release: >>>> >>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release >>>> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments) >>>> >>>> This vote will be open for 72 hours. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Regards >>>> JB >>>> >>> > > > -- > Freeman Fang > ------------------------ > Open Source SOA: http://fusesource.com > >
