Hi,

as already stated in IRC the blue one looks good but I think it does not really 
fit to an Apache project.
Don't get me wrong on this but it looks somehow too cold and commercial. 

Good:
--------------------------------
- the search box top right together with the ASF logo
- the use of boxes as also done in the mockup at 
http://servicemix.apache.org/home2
- the bottom alternate navigation as text links

What I would like to do different:
----------------------------------------------
- have an entry page without side navigation
- another project logo (already have one in mind but want to make a picture 
first)
- less menu items / pages
- an extensive features page
- put some nice looking boxes on welcome page for Downloads, Documentation and 
Contributing (like on http://www.opensuse.org)
- breadcrumbs for better orientation
- activity stream on the welcome page for Twitter, Blogs, News and Jira

Hope this helps,

Lars



Am 21.10.2010 um 08:44 schrieb Łukasz Dywicki:

> Hello,
> I have two updates for you:
> 
> Black version
> http://img685.imageshack.us/img685/5087/servicemix.jpg
> Blue version
> http://img301.imageshack.us/img301/6781/servicemix2.jpg
> 
> Regards,
> Lukasz
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Łukasz Dywicki [mailto:l...@code-house.org] 
> Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 2:19 PM
> To: dev@servicemix.apache.org
> Subject: [Discussion] Design update
> 
> Hi all,
> The changes in ServiceMix are  hot topic now so I'll try too to provoke
> another discuss. Current page design is not the best, only little bit better
> than plain wiki.
> 
> My young intern have a lot of free time until december so I gave him task:
> update servicemix web page design. 
> Here is first snapshot of his work:
> 
> http://tinyurl.com/smx-proto
> 
> Don't get this as final (it even don't look like final) or only one proposal
> - this is only demo.
> We are open for ideas how to make webpage look and feel better.
> 
> If you have idea how to make servicemix webpage better - simply let us know,
> we'll implement it.
> 
> Regards,
> Lukasz
> 
> 

Reply via email to